SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Network Associates (NET) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: puborectalis who wrote (1720)11/25/1997 9:24:00 PM
From: AlienTech  Respond to of 6021
 
>>I honestly believe that many institutional people holding the stock read the comments on SI and have been influenced by your eloquent and logical analysis of the situation and are going to vote NO to the proxy.Steve...<<

Yes Paul is good at analysing.. And you dont need to vote NO, You just need to NOT VOTE at ALL!



To: puborectalis who wrote (1720)11/25/1997 10:08:00 PM
From: Wigglesworth  Respond to of 6021
 
<<I even received a phone call in addition to 3 mailings including one Express mail.>>

Damn, I should not have voted so fast by phone. Larson would have personally called me to beg for my votes. This MF should rank pretty close to White of Informix as destroyer of shareholders' wealth.



To: puborectalis who wrote (1720)11/26/1997 3:22:00 AM
From: Chuzzlewit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6021
 
Thanks for the kind words, Steve. I frankly doubt that I've had any influence. I think what's happening is that a lot of funds see exactly what I saw.

Regards,

Paul