SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hope Praytochange who wrote (134217)6/1/2012 3:27:24 PM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224674
 
EXCELLENT!! I had to send that on email to my friends and kids.



To: Hope Praytochange who wrote (134217)6/1/2012 8:51:31 PM
From: tonto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224674
 
GREENSBORO, N.C. — They thought he was guilty. But they couldn’t convict him.

Such was the conundrum for three jurors in the John Edwards corruption trial who recounted their deliberations Friday morning in an interview on NBC’s “Today” show.Those jurors and five others who spoke to ABC’s “Good Morning America” painted a picture of a deeply divided jury riven by a stubborn minority that wanted to convict Edwards of campaign finance violations and an equally headstrong majority that did not think the prosecution proved its case.

124
Comments
Weigh InCorrections?


Personal Post
Gallery

John Edwards’s life and political career:?The former presidential candidate faced federal campaign-finance charges in a case that led Thursday to a mistrial.
More from PostPolitics
Obama: From dove to tough guy

Aaron Blake 3:15 PM ET
THE FIX | When it comes to foreign policy, Obama’s image is starting to look a little like his predecessor.
Clinton calls Romney record “sterling”

Aaron Blake 10:13 AM ET
The biggest name in Democratic politics (outside of Obama) stuck another fork in the Bain strategy.
John Edwards not after a comeback

Melinda Henneberger 9:16 AM ET
SHE THE PEOPLE | Instead, it seems he’s looking for a kind of redemption to keep getting up in the morning.

A key question was whether Edwards knew about $1 million in payments from Virginia heiress Rachel “Bunny” Mellon and Edwards’s campaign finance chairman, Fred Baron, to cover up his affair with Rielle Hunter. Juror Ladonna Foster told “Today” show host Matt Lauer that she thinks “Edwards had some knowledge. I think he definitely had some knowledge of the money, where the money was going, especially the money from Mrs. Mellon.” But juror Cindy Aquaro said Edwards was “just smart enough to hide it, and we could not find the evidence.”

A key flaw in the prosecution case was its reliance on the testimony of Andrew Young, the Edwards aide who built a luxury home with money from Baron and wrote a bestselling book about his experiences with Edwards.

“I think the credibility of the witness was something that was of utmost importance to us,” jury foreman David Recchion told NBC.

Recchion also said that the Edwards case highlighted the need for stronger campaign finance laws.