SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lorne who wrote (134255)6/2/2012 10:43:09 AM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224706
 
Poor sound quality but interesting. He did however, bait the Secret Service because he knew they would have no option but to interview him. Still kinda funny, but would be far more interesting if it had better audio.



To: lorne who wrote (134255)6/2/2012 11:34:18 AM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224706
 
I might also note that Secret Service may have been concerned because he suggested an execution method that isn't available by by Federal Law. Due to that it isn't unconceivable that he might deviate in his other methods.



To: lorne who wrote (134255)6/2/2012 9:12:17 PM
From: Wayners1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224706
 
Did they ask where to pick up hookers after the interview was over?



To: lorne who wrote (134255)6/3/2012 4:18:37 AM
From: Farmboy8 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224706
 
I find it truly offensive that having served in the military somehow makes one more likely as a suspect to do harm to the president.

Seems that is the way this administration rolls, though.

We 'clingers' are labeled as crackpot-possible-terrorists for being veterans and believing in the freedoms outlined in the constitution.