Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (114807)	6/5/2012 11:24:04 AM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 149317

when you determine it is necessary to go to war It was never necessary. The neocons wanted Clinton to go after Saddam in 1997. When he refused and the neocons came to power, they took the excuse of 9/11 to attack Saddam. They wanted to attack Saddam even before 9/11. So the decision to go to war to fight 9/11 is a total lie designed to deliberately mislead people. You need to have a broader view so as to to have the ability to form opinions in a broader perspective. Obama is fighting the war on AQ and it is not only achieving its goal but it is not costing the colossal money. And yes I understand your refusal to get involved in meaningful exchange and instead just throw up rhetorical sentences. Cutting taxes, as I pointed out, is one of the few things government can actually do about a lousy economy. There you go again. The taxes have been cut since 2003. Where are the jobs being created. Instead we lost jobs at a phenomenal rate when Bush cut the taxes in 2003. And then Obama kept that extension sufficient enough to prove to those tax cut proponents that it does not create jobs. And Romney should have the audacity to say that jobs are not being produced fast enough? Well he and even you need to look at the tax levels of the Reagan and Clinton years and draw your conclusions on what the taxes should be for job creation and not spit out wholesale what some wingnut sites say. But trying to ban the use of important and useful descriptive language seems silly. Use of terms "you liberals" and "you conservatives" are not considered useful descriptive languages. They are personal attacks. There are no liberals and conservatives here. This board is critical of Obama by those who also applaud his policies and actions e.g. US actions in Libya, Obama campaign in attacking Bain instead of Romney etc. etc. It is not my board. I just facilitate in such a way that others feel comfortable posting. Those who continue to post here generally agree that I serve their interests to the extent that they feel comfortable. So it is not my board. There are many folks who post on this board who have views that are opposite to mine. They continue to do so because they have a good knack of expressing their opinions. And they are do so successfully because they are very smart so as not to offend those who disagree with them.