Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (26740)	6/6/2012 2:33:09 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

You're the one who said: "All creatures act to their benefit." Bears are creatures of the Creator just as much as Humans are. If you wanted to say only Humans act to their benefit then you should have. <<"All animals have different Natures evolved through Evolution. That includes humans.">> “Of course that simply begs the question…” "Again, your response is empty and completely stupid." You're the only one who thinks that insults are arguments. Sorry to disappoint your small and closed mind, but they're NOT! You're assuming Evolution as your premise and then using it as a basis to conclude that Evolution is true. “Again: it's perfectly reasonable to kill your kid if it will bring about your desires. Just ask Susan Smith. Why is that illogical? "the ideas of Susan Smith did not represent any consensus arrived at by reasonable people setting the moral guidelines for any particular community!" You keep invoking the talisman of reason but never seem able to use it yourself. Given your own relativistic view; you have NOT shown why killing your children so you can party is either illogical or wrong. By smuggling in objective moral absolutes that are foreign to your position you betray yourself, which you freely admit when you think no body is paying attention: ``Of course you can do anything you desire if it is within your capacity to do. Nobody said you could not.`` You are clearly obsessed/enraged at the idea that God would judge His creatures” The “god” who sent two bears to maul 42 innocent children to death is a myth. Your assumption that this myth angers me is absolutely erroneous... It`s an observation not an assumption. This historical account is the one you cite over and over again and usually results in you going on one of your vile and blasphemous rants. To be continued...