Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul V. who wrote (134614)

6/6/2012 11:52:36 PM

From: MJ

3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224705

Please distinguish which part of this post is your post and which part is the other person's words.

As you have written your post there is no distinguishing between what should be in quotes and what should not be in quotes.

Thanks----mj

Message #134614 from Paul V. at 6/6/2012 9:13:08 PM

Farmboy,

Snake handlers .... are fine

the disfiguring of young girls' vaginas ..... isn't

the killing of teenage daughters for dating an infidel ..... isn't

So tell me .. just where does the first amendment end, and the rule of law begin?

Seriously .... what does one do with such conduct, when the constitution appears it may allow it?

You present some interesting situations. Just were does the US, State and governmental laws and case law infringe on religion vs the rights of the general public. Are some laws to be disregarded such as discrimination against women, creed, national origin or life style, or abortion, due not resuscitate laws, (DNR) or countless other actions which could be interpreted as infringement on religion.

To: Paul V. who wrote (134614)	6/7/2012 12:30:51 AM
From: Farmboy	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224705

Not being a jerk, but yes, I know they are 'interesting situations' ... I brought them up to see if you had any comments about them ... not just so you could tell me what I already knew. And why do you post everything in italics? Sure makes it hard to decipher which part of your post is the original poster's post and which part is yours.

To: Paul V. who wrote (134614)	6/7/2012 12:52:31 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie	10 Recommendations Respond to of 224705

this is why liberals have such a tough time with the constitution. it isnt the rights of the general public, it is the rights of individuals. when the practice of a religion violates the rights of individuals, it is not protected by the constitution. the united states is not about the collective. it is about the individual. i

To: Paul V. who wrote (134614)	6/7/2012 11:42:17 AM
From: longnshort	12 Recommendations Respond to of 224705

Libs around SI are saying about the Walker win, how could wisconsin people vote against their own interest ? What ? they did vote for their own interests, they are tired of being taxed to death just so Public sector union people could get raises every year while their salaries stayed the same. I heard a guy on the radio from Wisc say. 'I saw them marching down the street, Public sector union people, students, commies, professional poor people, union thugs, acorn members and I said to my self, My taxes are paying for all these people and they are coming after me for more money, I said NO MORE and I voted for walker'