SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: HPilot who wrote (134722)6/8/2012 1:47:45 PM
From: locogringo2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224704
 
He will be lucky to hold onto Illinois.

Until this week, I usually discounted this idea as a pipedream. However, the "Freudian slips" by Clinton and the news about Obama backhanding the Daley's and the Chicago machine may have some validity.

Rahm controls Chicago and Cook County now, and owes his allegiance to the Clintons. Those are millions of votes, dead and alive. Rahm left much too early, and he was disgusted that Obama pursued Obamacare.

It was just hard for me to believe that Valerie Jarrett had more power than Daley, but she does.


"I also surmise that there’s another thing going on here, a Chicago game. Although Chicago is a One Party State, that party is rent into factions that barely coexist at the best of times, and battle viciously at others. Obama’s alter ego (or is it Svengali?), Valerie Jarrett, and Daley are from opposing, hostile, factions. Jarrett was not pleased by Daley’s presence. Jarrett is a hardcore progressive. Daley’s goal–as described by Chait–was to soften the progressivism.

Daley’s departure likely marks Jarrett’s victory. It also signals, as Chait suggests, a turn to a more hardcore progressive policy and strategy: if Jarrett has the wheel, there ain’t going to be any right turns. It is a move towards the Occupy types and a move away from the corporatist, Democratic party establishment personified by Daley."

streetwiseprofessor.com



To: HPilot who wrote (134722)6/8/2012 2:23:28 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224704
 
Obama can win without winning, Florida and Ohio but he must win Virginia.



To: HPilot who wrote (134722)6/8/2012 3:02:52 PM
From: MJ2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224704
 
That Wisconsin victory is going to sweep on down through Illinois---- and then Arkansas is going to consolidate against Obama----there goes the middle part of USA.

Romney did very well in the Northern part of Illinois during the Primary. Romney will consolidate that Northern part of Illinois and then the rest of Illinois comes along -------the rest of Illinois being the part that is tired of Chicago ruling Illinois.