SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (73596)6/8/2012 2:25:10 PM
From: calgal  Respond to of 103300
 
The Magazine
Learning from Failure An education agenda for Mitt Romney.
Jun 11, 2012, Vol. 17, No. 37 • By FREDERICK M. HESS AND ANDREW P. KELLY



Single Page Print Larger Text Smaller Text Alerts



The Republican presidential candidates have spent the past year saying little about education. When they have addressed the issue, it has often been in terse calls to “turn off the lights” at the U.S. Department of Education. After a decade of runaway spending and regulations on education by both the Bush and Obama administrations—with little to show for it—it’s easy to see why conservatives have little patience for talk of anything that seems to invite federal activity. But the reality is federal engagement isn’t going away.

Mitt Romney meets with students in West Philadelphia

Newscom

Last week, presumptive GOP nominee Mitt Romney unveiled an agenda for education reform centered on promising themes such as school choice, innovation, transparency, and return on investment. Most important, Romney’s plans turn the page on the decade-long romance with expansive No Child Left Behind-style federal intervention.

But the work should not stop there. A coherent agenda should not only move us away from policies that have proven unsuccessful; it should also use the lessons from those missteps to draft a new approach. Instead of settling for vague paeans to choice and innovation, Romney should chart a course for federal involvement that capitalizes on areas where government is well-positioned to play a productive role and avoids the pitfalls unearthed by previous administrations.





To: calgal who wrote (73596)6/8/2012 2:31:05 PM
From: calgal1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 

Romney: Obama Is 'Out of Touch'1:33 PM, Jun 8, 2012 • By DANIEL HALPER
Earlier today, President Obama assured American that "the private sector is doing fine." Now, Republican Mitt Romney has responded by saying that the president is "out of touch."

"Now this morning, the president had a press conference. I don’t know if you heard it, but he called a press conference and pulled people in and said a number of things, and one of the most interesting things he said was this: he said the private sector is doing fine. He said the private sector is doing fine," Romney said. "Is he really that out of touch?"

Romney continued: "I think he’s defining what it means to be detached and out of touch with the American people. Has there ever been an American president who is so far from reality as to believe in an America where 23 million Americans are out of work, or stopped looking for work, or can only find part-time jobs and need full-time jobs, where the economy grew in the first quarter of the year at only 1.9 percent, where the median income in America has dropped by 10% over the last four years, where there have been record number of home foreclosures, for the President of the United States to stand up and say the private sector is doing fine is going to go down in history. It's an extraordinary miscalculation and misunderstanding by a President who is out of touch, and we're going to take back this country and get America working again."



Chris Christie: Obama Is Driving America Off a Fiscal Cliff 1:19 PM, Jun 8, 2012 • By DANIEL HALPERNew Jersey Republican governor Chris Christie blasted President Obama in a speech earlier today at a conservative conference in Chica