Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (17768)	6/9/2012 4:32:16 PM
From: longnshort	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

look at your ban list and your comments,"wing nut', troll, etc all you do is personal attacks ? why are liberals such hypocrites ?

To: epicure who wrote (17768)	6/9/2012 5:28:04 PM
From: Murrey Walker	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

*Since I don't post to or about you, I fail to see why that justifies calling me princess smarmy* Read your own thread header at VFC. Since you're the moderator, I believe you wrote it yourself. Then go to your list of bans, and tell me it doesn't smack of smarminess. Then read this (it comes from a dictionary): smarmy \|'smärme\| adjective ( smarmier , smarmiest ) informal ingratiating and wheedling in a way that is perceived as insincere or excessive :a smarmy, unctuous reply. And now the reasons: While the adjective I've placed on you is so richly deserved IMO, it's derived from reading your posts at VFC over the years. And that was before we placed each other on ignore (I could care less of what you say now days.). My original post to/about you addressed the manner this thread's moderator kept his cool. There was a period on VFC (that name's still a misnomer) when Paul posted opposing views to the stuff you and your thread mates are so "famous" for espousing. And YOU banned him. If I recall correctly, YOU were just tired of reading his posts. And you banned others with little to no reason, other than the fact they were presenting opposing views to your echo chamber. Does any of above ring a bell? *And you wonder why I wouldn't want to be around you?* I didn't wonder anything of the kind; you're hallucinating if you think that I would like to be around you. Two posts to me this afternoon. Maybe what I've said about your persona hits home.