Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (88722)	6/10/2012 11:29:27 AM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

"But for the purpose of our discussion , we should focus on the short term discrepancy between 1860 and 1861." Why you think the south all of a sudden got pissed ? we should go back to 1828, hell we should go back to 1789 when slaves were only counted as 2/3s. and you have seem to have left the north invaded Sumter debate "In sum, it's clear that Ad Valorum revenue from the South, while significant, DID NOT represent the majority of Federal revenues." you are not counting the northern revenue reaceived from the south because of the tariffs, that revenue was going to Britian but now to the north, a winfall tariff ad valorum revenue. you are not adding that in. as I said before I wasn 't talking about cotton but southern money heading north