Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ManyMoose who wrote (490634)	6/11/2012 9:21:30 PM
From: ManyMoose	6 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793955

The guy who sent me that has property with a swale. I have a swale. So we have a little swale that's wet all winter and after a lot of rain we have water running across the driveway. Looks like the EPA wants to get involved. I think I'll cut the timber and bring in 95 truckloads of fill the flatten out the ground and eliminate the low area. Probably cheaper than 5 minutes with the EPA.

To: ManyMoose who wrote (490634)	6/12/2012 7:31:28 AM
From: D. Long	6 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793955

by claiming the sources are part of navigable waterways. Hey, why don't we just regulate the entire biosphere as "navigable waters." It all ties into the "navigable waters" eventually.

To: ManyMoose who wrote (490634)	6/12/2012 10:04:39 AM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793955

How is that necessary when we already have a government body that determines if a waterway is navigable? uscg.mil

To: ManyMoose who wrote (490634)	6/12/2012 10:14:41 AM
From: Tom Clarke	Respond to of 793955

ditches, gullies and other ephemeral spots by claiming the sources are part of navigable waterways navigable by who? (or is it whom?)