Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul V. who wrote (135077)	6/12/2012 9:01:32 AM
From: locogringo	7 Recommendations Respond to of 224729

What am I missing? 1. Common sense. 2. intelligence. 3. being courteous you notice that I was asking a question in my post. It's actually nearly impossible to notice what is what in your posts, with the lack of grammar and formatting. Answering a question with another question does not work with me. I do not waste my time to answering fools who do not want to have an intellectual discussion!!! Actually, you DO NOT answer 99.9% of questions put to you, including the TEA PARTY DEATH SQUADS explanations that you LIED about. I think you owe CFRebel an apology, because the REAL fool is YOU! HTH, but I seriously doubt it, and don't really care.

To: Paul V. who wrote (135077)	6/12/2012 7:08:39 PM
From: CF Rebel	2 Recommendations Respond to of 224729

Let me walk you through this. You ask: What am I missing?you notice that I was asking a question in my post. You think I owe you an answer to a question you asked? I have asked you politely, several times in the past, to explain or give citation to an apparently false claim you made and never received an answer from you at all. And you think I owe you an answer? By the way, here's what I'm referring to: Please explain where it is legal to take one life and have "death squads" that the TEA PARTY pushed during the healthcare debate. http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=27640892 And then you say: Answering a question with another question does not work with me. I do not waste my time to answering fools who do not want to have an intellectual discussion!!! Of all people, you want to have an intellectual discussion? FYI, an intellectual discussion is a two-way street where sobriety, good faith and staying on-topic are required to enable such. You've never demonstrated the ability to do so even though others, including myself have given you plenty of chances (for example, see the link above). When you can respect others' legitimate inquiries into what appear to be outrageous claims by you and answer them respectfully, then maybe I'll consider you to be worthy of colloquy. Oh, and stop embarrassing yourself with comments like the last one you made in that post. CF Rebel