SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PJr who wrote (491106)6/15/2012 3:11:26 PM
From: goldworldnet1 Recommendation  Respond to of 793801
 
Hard to say, Iraq and Iran did a pretty good job of keeping each other in check.

* * *



To: PJr who wrote (491106)6/15/2012 3:16:02 PM
From: skinowski3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793801
 
but just think if Bush wouldn't have gone into Iraq ....... we'd have TWO wild men bent on pursuing nuclear weapons in that region.

I think make it THREE -- Qaddafi would not have given up his program. The problem is that somewhere along the way we got in too deep, and lost the ability to apply credible pressure on Iran. Iran was more important than mediating between the waring factions in Iraq.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News