SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (191872)6/17/2012 2:52:24 PM
From: cnyndwllr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543847
 
John, re: "One of the issues that strikes me about calling the south anti-intellectual involves the votes of Gore and Fullbright against the 1964 civil rights act.

Both, in my estimation, were quite "intellectual". I can't imagine a version of "intellectual" that would exclude them, particularly political intellectuals. Yet, for political reasons, somewhat different in each case, they voted against the 1964 act."

But that's the point, assuming that a vote against the 64 civil rights act was "anti-intellectual," then Gore, who clearly was intellectual, voted against it because the majority of the people who voted him into office weren't. I.e., the south was anti-intellectual. Ed



To: JohnM who wrote (191872)6/17/2012 3:41:27 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543847
 
<<One of the issues that strikes me about calling the south anti-intellectual involves the votes of Gore and Fullbright against the 1964 civil rights act. >>

Boy, I did not know that. I am sure in both cases they did it for political survival. Neither of those guys had an oz of racism in them I am sure. Too smart, as you say.

Just like Hillary and all the dems that voted for the Iraq war. They remembered what happened to Morris and Gruening.