SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (135691)6/20/2012 7:39:02 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224759
 
<< the committee is investigating what is involved with the Obamacover up.>> They will have to do better than that. I think they are trying to prove that Holder lied when he initially said he was aware of the program.



To: tonto who wrote (135691)6/20/2012 7:45:02 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224759
 
If the House votes for contempt, then it is up to a DC prosecutor (employee of DOJ) to file the charge in District Court. I doubt whether this can be done because of the claim of privilege. It would be a conflict of interest.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News