Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (74190)	6/22/2012 8:29:05 PM
From: Hope Praytochange	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 103300

As for the president, his big campaign speech last week in Cleveland not only was roundly panned but was deeply revealing. In it—all 54 minutes of it—he attempted to make the case for his economic stewardship and his re-election. What he revealed is that he doesn't know the case for his own re-election. Politicians give 54-minute speeches when they don't know what they're trying to say but are sure the next sentence will tell them. So they keep talking. They keep saying sentences in the hope that meaning will finally emerge from one of them. A 54-minute speech is not a sign of Fidel-like confidence, or a love for speaking. A 54-minute speech is a sign of desperation. More Peggy Noonan Read Peggy Noonan's previous columns click here to order her book, Patriotic Grace It was a speech about everything—renewable energy, tax credits, Abraham Lincoln, tax loopholes, deficit imbalances, infrastructure, research and development incentives. But a speech about everything is a speech about nothing. I listened once and read it twice: It wasn't a case for re-election, it was a wordage dump. The president has wrestled for the past six months with themes. He's jumped from one to another. They are: It's not so bad—this indicator is up, and that one. OK, it's bad, but it could have been worse—my actions kept us from tanking. It's bad, but it's Bush's fault. It's bad, but it's the congressional Republicans' fault. I have made it less bad, and I need more time to make it even less badder. Rich people have fancy cars and car elevators, I stand for jalopies and street parking. None of it has worked. What does it say of a crisis presidency at a dramatic moment that a president can't make the case for his own re-election, can't find his own meaning? It says the other guy can win—if he has meaning. And isn't just a handsome stranger who says, "I'm not the last guy, I'm not the guy you don't like." That won't do this year.