To: dan grone who wrote (13097 ) 11/26/1997 12:52:00 PM From: CalculatedRisk Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18263
Dan, I applaud Jack King's decision to sell! IMO, selling is the correct decision. Lets review the transaction. According to the following SEC filing:sec.gov On 9/30/96, Mr. King had 601,924 shares of exercisable options. This had a value (on 9/30/96) of $5.122M based on the then fair market of $9.875 less the exercise price of the option. (This is directly from the SEC filing). This means Mr. King's average exercise price is $1.36. Since these options are "expiring" they most likely have exercise prices below the average - but lets use the average for calculation purposes. 1) Mr. King exercised 100K options at $1.36. Fair market value is $12.45 (according to the 144 filing). Since these are non-qualified options (thanks to Mr. Suzman for reminding me!), Mr. King has a taxable event of $1.11M. ($12.45 - $1.36) * 100K shares. 2) Mr. King's maximum tax liability is 40% (28% FED, 11% CA State). This is $0.44M in taxes. 3) Mr. King sold 60K options at $12.45 or $747K Cash to Mr. King. 4) Mr. King paid $136K for the shares. $747K less $136K = $611K to Mr. King. 5) If we subtract taxes of $444K from cash received $611K - Mr. King received $167K after taxes. 6) Of course, Mr. King may use a "full service" broker (transaction costs) and this will reduce the cash in his wallet. My $200K calculation used slightly different assumptions - but it is evident that Mr. King put serious after tax money in his pocket AND raised his tax basis on the remaining 40K shares to $12.45! BTW, reread the press release. This is typical Kingese. The PR implies that King just covered his costs and taxes - but if you read the text carefully - his selling was "driven by the need to cover costs and the resulting tax liability" - and, oh well, put a little cash in King's pocket too<G>. Regards, Bill