SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TideGlider who wrote (493099)6/28/2012 12:07:50 PM
From: MulhollandDrive1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793917
 
indeed....

yet another supreme court challenge to this TAX citing the 14th amendment

if they refuse to hear it, it would appear that the congress's ability to tax supersedes all other constitutional protections



To: TideGlider who wrote (493099)6/28/2012 12:09:05 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793917
 
I wonder if Roberts addressed the constitutionality of 'waivers' in light of his finding that the penalty is tax.



To: TideGlider who wrote (493099)6/28/2012 12:20:06 PM
From: Alan Smithee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793917
 
I believe it is a violation of the 14 Amendment. I suppose anyone not exempted has standing.
The Courts would likely say the case is not ripe until you are required to pay the tax or penalized for not paying.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News