Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (493118)	6/29/2012 12:47:07 AM
From: carranza2	6 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793955

As far as I can tell, there are few jurisprudential limits on the power to tax and few statutory ones. The interpretative doctrine needs a shakeup, too. The courts take the position that they are required to find a statute constitutional by any means reasonably necessary. In other words, doubts are resolved in favor of upholding congressional power. This is exactly what Roberts did - he followed established doctrine. Because our Constitution enumerates federal powers, with those not specifically granted reserved to the States, I am of the opinion that the interpretation of the reach of congressional power should be stringent rather than broad, with doubts resolved against constitutionality. This is in accord with the Founders desires that the federal government be a limited one. There is a lot of historical support for this notion but it is too late. It will therefore take something earth shattering to effect meaningful change, e.g., electing RP. Vbg I'm pretty sure the Founders would be amazed if they were to see the size and power of the present federal government - including that of the Executive branch. They were very wise. Influenced of course by the enormous power wielded by Kings. It makes me think that what we have now is not a republic but a monarchy of limited duration with the dukes and barons sitting on Capitol Hill.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (493118)	6/29/2012 12:59:59 AM
From: carranza2	Respond to of 793955

Remember this song? ********** Let me tell you how it will be There's one for you, nineteen for me 'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah, I'm the taxman Should five per cent appear too small Be thankful I don't take it all 'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah I'm the taxman If you drive a car, I'll tax the street, If you try to sit, I'll tax your seat. If you get too cold I'll tax the heat, If you take a walk, I'll tax your feet. Don't ask me what I want it for If you don't want to pay some more 'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah, I'm the taxman Now my advice for those who die Declare the pennies on your eyes 'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah, I'm the taxman And you're working for no one but me. *****************