Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (493155)	6/28/2012 1:37:28 PM
From: sm1th	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793964

President Romney can refuse to implement it That is good for at most 8 years. As bad as the law is, the bigger danger is that it reinforces the idea of unbounded Federal authority. Only the court can undo that.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (493155)	6/28/2012 2:26:21 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	3 Recommendations Respond to of 793964

I think the chances for a Republican Senate just went up sharply. Remember how the Democrats used reconciliation to help pass this. Also, President Romney can refuse to implement it, just like Obama wrote new law via the EPA. What goes around comes around. Yup, Obama has set a lot of precedent. How about the selective enforcement of immigration laws? When the republicans are in control it will be time to selective enforce other laws on the books.