Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mistermj who wrote (493335)	6/28/2012 11:39:55 PM
From: skinowski	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793882

I don't think it was a screw-up. It's the whole idea. If insurers will try raising rates to compensate for the huge losses, the government will move in and "rescue" us. And Roberts is right -- under the Constitution, it's not his place to design or change laws. His responsibility is limited only to judging their constitutionality. AND: To say it's a "design for collapse" is to set up the question whether it was a screw-up or whether it was the first move in a scheme to take us to a single-payer, government health care program.