Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cautious_Optimist who wrote (88952)	6/29/2012 9:53:03 AM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

That's the spin Rather is putting on it to cover his wrecking of his career. He based a major story just before a Presidential election on easily debunked forged documents. The idea that a network would can longterm, respected employees over "GOP political interests" is laughable ... if that could happen, the networks wouldn't be staffed with liberals. How hypocritical it is of you to talk about "truthtelling", "winnner-take-all", and "ends justify the means", while defending Rather and Mapes who tried to throw an election with a story they had to have known was a lie. Rather and Mapes wanted to help defeat Bush and that end justified pushing a fake story based on obvious forgeries.