SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Smith who wrote (493397)6/29/2012 9:45:07 AM
From: Bill5 Recommendations  Respond to of 793916
 
Roberts rewrote it.

Justice Kennedy's dissent on behalf of Scalia, Thomas, and Alito:
Our cases establish a clear line between a tax and a penalty: “[A] tax is an enforced contribution to provide for the support of government; a penalty … is an exaction imposed by statute as punishment for an unlawful act.” United States v.Reorganized CF&I Fabricators of Utah, Inc., 518 U. S. 213, 224 (1996) (quoting United States v.La Franca, 282 U. S. 568, 572 (1931)). In a few cases, this Court has held that a “tax” imposed upon private conduct was so onerous as to be in effect a penalty. But we have never held—never—that a penalty imposed for violation of the law was so trivial as to be in effect a tax. We have never held that any exaction imposed for violation of the law is an exercise of Congress’ taxing power—even when the statute calls it a tax, much less when (as here) the statute repeatedly calls it a penalty.



To: Paul Smith who wrote (493397)6/29/2012 10:14:50 AM
From: DMaA4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793916
 
And we must minimize the gravity of what Roberts did since a Republican picked him. If we recognize just what apauling damage the man did yesterday that would detract from the battle cry - Elections Have Consequences". But do they?

The experience of the past 50 years, of the inexerable march toward tyranny, I actually don't see that march affected much by the party of the guy sitting in the WH.



To: Paul Smith who wrote (493397)6/29/2012 11:10:09 AM
From: KLP2 Recommendations  Respond to of 793916
 
Romney rakes in $4.2 million after high court ruling...


More than a few people are waking up....

The answer is to elect Romney and a Republican Senate.

(AND KEEP THE HOUSE)