Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (493564)	6/30/2012 11:16:54 AM
From: Honey_Bee	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793958

It's a good spin, but likely that's all it is. We lost at the Supreme Court, thanks to Roberts. All he had to do was follow the Constitution, he didn't. Now our last hope to do damage control is to elect Mitt Romney.

To: KLP who wrote (493564)	6/30/2012 12:39:20 PM
From: skinowski	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793958

And while he did not eliminate Obamacare for us, isn't it fair of him to ask why we can't do that for ourselves, in November? He's given us a huge constitutional victory, why can't we respond with an equally large electoral victory in five months? It is unreasonable to expect the Court to solve all our problems, isn't it? Maybe this is spin, but it makes sense. Good article, overall. I'm not sure I know enough to appreciate the depth of the Constitution related victories, which supposedly follow from the Roberts' decision, but I sense that those victories may in fact be quite important. Especially if Obama will lose November, making it possible to consider a REAL healthcare reform.