Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (23961)	7/1/2012 3:23:36 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 42652

>> I cannot see any reason that a person who is more smarter That clearly leaves me out...

To: i-node who wrote (23961)	7/1/2012 4:26:00 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

s to being in the top 3% of earners, why in hell SHOULDN'T they be? They've committed more to getting prepared for their careers, on average, than ANYONE. Actually that's not true. But despite that, compensation should be based on performance and efficiency, not education. Right? Or are you saying Docs are a unique profession that should be compensated based solely of the cost and time of their education? Good efficient Docs make lots and lots and lots of money. Fair Docs make lots and lots of money. Poor inefficient Docs make lots of money and whine lots and lots and lots. What else is new?