SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : JAB International (JABI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: virginijus poshkus who wrote (1632)11/26/1997 4:53:00 PM
From: Jeffery E. Forrest  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4571
 
***********************************OFFTOPIC-------------------------
virginia, In English please. I have absolutely no idea what you are attempting to say. Your communications skills are obviously as poor as your "righting"(sic) skills.

I usually would not get into a battle of wits with somebody with such a lack of weaponry, but when you start threatening folks with lawsuits something needs to be said.

If you're going to sue everyone who thinks your an idiot, I suggest you get SEVERAL lawyers. I doubt that even OJ's dream team could find you anything but guilty though.

There's an old Maine saying that seems appropriate.
You maam, are more full of crap than a Thanksgiving turkey.



To: virginijus poshkus who wrote (1632)11/26/1997 8:50:00 PM
From: dental-eye  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4571
 
so far the facts are these, a company buys 50% of bcmd at 16mm+, or they are going to buy 50%. multiply by 2 and low and behold, we have 32mm for the whole company, exclusive of the ice play. that works out to 70cents a share. remember, cost does not indicate value but only hopes to support it.

This is misleading. We know that the JV deal only covers the "gold mining properties" of BCMD. And the co. is working on another JV deal for its diamond exploring business. How much should it be worth? Let's say BCMD gets another $10-15 MM for selling about 50% of its "diamond properties". Then it's $52-62 MM for the WHOLE company, or 1.2-1.4 per share, according to your theory. Of course, the stock can be traded much higher for the great potentials BCMD has.

Does anyone have more thoughts on this?

D.



To: virginijus poshkus who wrote (1632)11/30/1997 3:54:00 PM
From: GOLDIGER  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4571
 
Hi virginijus,

A MUST READ FOR ALL.

Interesting articles for your enjoyment and safety.

stockdetective.com
stockdetective.com
stockdetective.com

It is unlawful "to publish... or circulate any notice, circular,
advertisement... or communication which, though not purporting
to offer a security for sale, describes such security for a
consideration received or to be received, directly or indirectly,
from an issuer... without fully disclosing the receipt, whether past
or prospective, of such consideration and the amount thereof."

The latest proclamation from Securities and Exchange
Commission Chairman Arthur Levitt? A recently enacted law
from the U.S. Congress? Think again. The above passage is
contained in Section 17(b) of the Securities Act... written in
1933!

In plain English, publishers that have been compensated in any
way for discussing a stock -- even if it is not to be construed as
"investment advice" -- must disclose this fact, as well as the form
and the amount of the compensation.

The provision was "particularly designed to meet the evils of the
'tipster sheet,' as well as articles in newspapers or periodicals that
purport to give an unbiased opinion but which opinions in reality
are bought or paid for," according to the report from the
Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce which led to the
1933 law. The more things change...!

The stock promoters, for the most part, have successfully
ignored Section 17(b). Indeed, the SEC has been slow to enforce
it, perhaps because the agency's resources have increased at a
small fraction of the rate of increase of participants and assets
invested in the securities markets.

GOLDIGER.