Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (33008)	7/4/2012 5:04:53 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Respond to of 86352

Which plants go better with less CO2? No, I didn't take biology in college or school, but I have seen plants that are green and read that the green is chlorophyl for turning CO2 into plant with sun, water and minerals. I don't live in Antarctica and have never been there, but one doesn't have to have been somewhere to know something about somewhere these days. Heck, even before Cyberspace there were books and other information about remote locations. Now we can click and hey presto, there is the information, often better than is obtainable by actually visiting the place. < You don't even live here. I've seen trains up in Canada do the very same thing close to that spot. You need to stay "down under" in your world of ignorance. > If more alarmists "traveled" in Cyberspace instead of via airliners to exotic jamboree locatioins, then they'd produce a LOT less CO2 and hot air. <The writer of the post is an expert on atmospheric sciences.. Something you know nothing about! > His "aching lungs" suggest he has something wrong with them or he is not very scientific. Even coal miners don't get "aching lungs" from a bit of coal dust. Does he smoke cigarettes? That could cause his lungs to ache. A week or so of incidental coal dust wouldn't do it. I was a world expert on atmospheric sciences and came up with a patented CO2 sequestration process. Still am it seems [relatively] judging by the accuracy of the Alarmist prognostications. What do you think of my 2020 foresight prediction of 2020 reglaciation? And my prediction back in 2008 of the current sunspot cycle peak was right on the money, long before the official experts adjusted their wonky ideas towards reality. Mqurice

To: Eric who wrote (33008)	7/4/2012 5:58:46 PM
From: Brumar89	2 Recommendations Respond to of 86352

I'd love to see him name some plants that can't handle more CO2. Not all plants can tolerate a higher CO2 concentration.. This talking about CO2, a trace gas essential to life, as if it's poison or some dreadfully dangerous acid is ridiculous.