SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Network Associates (NET) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (1727)11/26/1997 4:59:00 PM
From: Terry Davis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6021
 
Paul,

I will concede that the response to the merger has been less than spectacular. But let's all face it, it's a done deal. My intent was merely to point out that McAfee is a train running out of track. They have made a point of warning of increased competitiont in their 10Qs.

Look at the qtr-to-qtr top line growth of MCAF over the last few quarters it's gone from 24% to 18% to low single digits in the most recent quarter. I hear all this talk about 80% growth, where is it? EPS is projected to grow by approximately 40% in the coming year. You provided a well thought out DCF and CAPM argument which is great, but you know very well that it's market multiples and comparable M&A transactions that drive deals, not finance theory. 5 times TTM revenues is not a huge number, nor is 35 to 40% an unreasonably high premium for a company growing in the 20 - 30% range.

Cheers,

Terry




To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (1727)11/26/1997 10:34:00 PM
From: puborectalis  Respond to of 6021
 
Another phone call from Mcafee requesting return of the proxies! Vote appears to be a nailbiter..let's hope the shareholders reject what's obviously not good for our company.Has Mr.Larson forgot that the shareholders OWN the company in a capitalist arrangement?



To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (1727)11/27/1997 1:51:00 AM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6021
 
Never have I received such personal attention than this proxy vote on the NETG merger. What do you think is going on? How much money are they spending on mail and phone calls in their attempt to convince the shareholder that this merger is the right thing. If they had thought this merger out a little better maybe they too would see that it is a "surrender" rather than a takeover. Does management have a hangover or are they just impetuous !