SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (75083)7/6/2012 6:13:33 AM
From: John4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Pelosi and her friends laughed and boasted that they had not read Obamacare, they did not know what was in Obamacare, and Congress would have to pass Obamacare to learn what was in it, which they promptly did.

The media reported those earth-shattering comments from Pelosi in the form of a two-second, garbled cough that was ignored by the masses. Instead, they report who Snooki is screwing, how the Katie Holmes-Tom Cruise divorce is evolving, and how the Chicago Police Superintendent has underscored that Whites are the sole source of problems for Blacks. That nonsense is around the clock news, which is yet another piece of the puzzle that strongly suggests that we live in a complete sham, GZ.

With the advent of Muslim Soetoro's tyranny, something that was once as trivial and ancillary as tax planning has suddenly become a very central and vital part of life, GZ. I'm not joking at all. To adapt to the changing totalitarian landscape, I now clearly see the need to begin spending considerably more money on professional tax planning and utilizing multiple sources for second and third opinions. I'm about to make several tax-planning consultants and estate lawyers very happy, unfortunately. -ng-



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (75083)7/6/2012 10:34:28 AM
From: Dennis Long1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 103300
 
snopes.com



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (75083)7/7/2012 10:08:55 PM
From: MJ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
This should be enough to sway homeowners votes and the votes of realtors.

Can this be taken back to the Supreme Court as a different case ---------that attacks
the mandate for the taxation at the time of sale by a homeowner?

This is now 'double taxation'--------one for the mandate for annual insurance and then the mandate
for taxation at the time of sale.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News