Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gallery Resources (Alberta GYR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert A. Sutherland who wrote (1103)	11/27/1997 11:17:00 AM
From: Kent C.	Respond to of 1829

Here is an interesting post made on the Donner thread: Message 2828118

To: Robert A. Sutherland who wrote (1103)	11/27/1997 11:29:00 AM
From: Kent C.	Respond to of 1829

Here's a theroy: The conductor (ore body or other) could be vertical. This might explain the "ghost" reading. A very strong vertical conductor (along with some other factors) could off-set the EM survey. A vertical structure would also make a more difficult drill target, and that would explain why the results of the drilling haven't confirmed the Strong EM readings. An accurate 3-D model will quickly prove or disprove this theory. My problem with this theory is that all the geophysics that I've seen do not look like they are indicating any vertical structures. The anomaly is so large, it looks like only a few drill holes should prove something up. Cheers, Kent