Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: unclewest who wrote (494630)	7/7/2012 7:51:37 PM
From: Sr K	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 793968

I think he and Axelrod neutralized it as an 2012 issue. That's all politically a Democrat could do. Aside from what happened May 1, 2011. Democrats at the national level learned from Bush/Rove in 2004. Romney has a no win position there. The best he can do is a draw. And Obama can still prevail in the debates by using his superior knowledge, and Romney can falter there by hesitating or giving a wrong answer. Kennedy prevailed over Nixon partially by "knowing" geography and naming Quemoy and Matsu, which probably very few voters could even locate on a map, in 1960 or 2012, or give their current names.