SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Atin who wrote (22280)11/26/1997 7:34:00 PM
From: elk  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 41046
 
All, Please do not consider Atin a basher of this stock. I have read his posts on both this and the VON thread. No where does he attack FTEL, though he critiques and criticizes, both of which are the purpose of SI. The VON thread is very informative and has done a good job of treating companies fairly. You may not agree with what he says, but that shouldn't degrade your response.

Evan



To: Atin who wrote (22280)11/26/1997 7:43:00 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41046
 
Atin, My reference to you being a "sleuth" was not in Jest, you seem very Knowledgable
and I thought that you had ferreted out information in reference to scalability.

Atin, you wrote: It takes 4 FTEL boards to do what 1 NMS board does for example.Most
industrial chassis have maybe 16 slots. That gives FTEL less room to scale in one chassis
and if they can go to multiple chassis, so can the competition.


Does this mean that FTEL is not capable of using a board the size of NMSS's? Does this
mean that the NMS board does Not take up as much space as the FTEL board in the same
chassis or the 1 NMSS board =4 FTEL boards, and has 4 times the capability of 1 FTEL
board?

Would it be possible to duplicate the fucntion+size of NMS's board
without compromising proprietary designs? If so How long could/would that take? If
indeed FTEL wanted to capture some of the "industrial" market, or is that not feasible or
possible?

I pose these questions, redundant tho they may seem because, I am not a technician and my
feeble mind is trying to understand how, apart from size, FTEL could not or would not be
able to go after this market

If my prose seemed offensive, I apologize here and now. Could you
try and answer my questions. I'll await your response.
bg



To: Atin who wrote (22280)11/29/1997 6:47:00 AM
From: Sly_  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41046
 
because I don't like dealing with FTEL folks within this thread for exactly the kinds of personal things that get said.

Atin, IMHO, the very fact that you work for the competition casts a serious cloud of doubt over your comments and motives. I don't blame you, I would be protecting my turf also. Again, IMHO, I give you an A+ for product knowledge and a flying F for credibility.

dm