Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Identix (IDNX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pluvia who wrote (5351)	11/26/1997 7:12:00 PM
From: brad greene	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26039

Steve, Please don't do this to the IDX thread. Take it somewhere else. Go to the "feelings" thread or somewhere else. There is no Cheer in the battle you have going with Westergaard.......and it really does not belong here....It will be sad if you decide to do your Nazi Police thing here. IDX is being sued by several factions.....everyone knows that. A few more here or there are not of great importance. bg

To: Pluvia who wrote (5351)	11/26/1997 7:26:00 PM
From: David	Respond to of 26039

Gee, Pluvia, last time I looked, calling people Nazis was actionable. Why don't you learn some manners and leave us alone.

To: Pluvia who wrote (5351)	11/26/1997 9:19:00 PM
From: marvin smith	Respond to of 26039

Pluvia(Steve), Westergaard in my opinon has did a miserable job of promoting IDX stock, so I don't they have any affect on this stock. So in my opinion IDX would do just as good without them. Marvin

To: Pluvia who wrote (5351)	11/27/1997 12:36:00 AM
From: Elvis Jones	Respond to of 26039

Three things... 1) I apologize for coming off so brash, but merely ask for this thread's sake the debate with Westergaard occur elsewhere. I did mention the P v. W thread for those who don't know the story. I guess we can say, "Thanks for the post. If the SEC announces anything against IDX, post it here." 2) I forgot to mention Value Line's coverage of IDX (last I checked it had a Timeliness rating of 2, on the buy side). The point of my prior posts is that we now have five sources covering IDX outside of Westergaard. We don't invest on JWs words alone. 3) I saw the CNTP stock chart. I could not turn that turkey around (even on Thanksgiving). But can I have a cyber-doughnut? Happily Long IDX (not CNTP, PLSIA or WSYS), Duke ps. I saw JWs page claiming you were never heard of after you received the "Cease and Desist". I read many posts you authored after receiving the letter. Those are on the PLSIA thread, for those interested.

To: Pluvia who wrote (5351)	11/27/1997 11:39:00 AM
From: ed doell	Respond to of 26039

You promised you wouldn't be back. Whatup about that? Ed

To: Pluvia who wrote (5351)	11/27/1997 11:55:00 AM
From: ed doell	Respond to of 26039

You promised you "shall not return to bother [us] with my nonsense again." >>With humble thanks in advance, I remain, yours truly, Svejk (P.S. Since I have absolutely no interest in this stock or this thread, please accept my sincerest humble apologies. I beg forgiveness for my rude interruption from all the distingushed ladies and gentlemen that frequent this fine gathering place. I shall not return to bother you with my nonsense again. Humble thanks.)<< Your post first post was only remotely appropriate to this SI thread. Your subsequent post to one of our thread members, Buck, was rude and uncalled for. Entirely inappropriate and sociopathic. You do not understand the concept of socially acceptable boundaries, and it is clear that you are too far gone to learn what those are. With freedom comes the necessity for respect and responsibility: you have not shown me that you have those qualities on this thread; in fact, the quite the opposite. You said it, not anyone of us: "My nonsense" is an exact characterization of YOUR USE of this SI thread and YOUR ABUSE of its membership. I had some respect for you standing up to Westergaard and holding your ground. But I have nothing but contempt for you now because of your self centered treatment of SI by these last two posts of yours, your fellow SI members on this thread, and your rude intrusion into this thread for your own agenda which had nothing to do with any of us so far as I know (and I've been active and a lurker here for some time). YOU will not be hearing from me again. Do not contact me, do not address me, do not refer to me on any SI board or by email. I will consider it harassment. Ed