SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael Mc Donough who wrote (75388)7/11/2012 3:45:24 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™1 Recommendation  Respond to of 103300
 
He's just another liar politician, how so many people bought into his hype is beyond belief... I'm glad you see the light now, thanks...

GZ



To: Michael Mc Donough who wrote (75388)7/11/2012 3:53:58 PM
From: Honey_Bee2 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 103300
 
Hi Michael...Glad to see you posting here. I'm not asking this question to be a smart alec, I sincerely want to know the answer.

What good things did you believe that Obama would do four years ago when you voted for him?



To: Michael Mc Donough who wrote (75388)7/12/2012 12:55:26 AM
From: Hope Praytochange1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Obama's Shrinking Majority

He won 9.5 million more votes than McCain. That won't happen again.

By KARL ROVE

Elections are about numbers, and right now the president's are bad. To
understand why, consider 2008 as a reference point. That year, Barack
Obama received 69,456,897 votes to John McCain's 59,934,814.

But a big chunk of President Obama's 9.5 million-vote advantage is
probably gone. Let's break this down. According to exit polls, 44.8
million Republicans showed up to vote in 2004 while only 41.4 million
did in 2008. Almost all those 3.4 million Republicans who stayed home
have been energized by Mr. Obama's agenda and are now eager to vote
against him.

Gallup found in April that Republicans were five points more likely to
vote than Democrats. More recent measures, including by the Pew
Research Center in June, show Republican voters displaying more
intense interest than Democrats. If 2008 stay-at-home Republicans
vote, Mr. Obama's margin would shrink by more than one-third (to 6.1
million). Similarly, the 2.4 million veterans who voted in 2004 but
did not in 2008 could turn out in 2012. Mr. McCain's winning margin
among vets was 10 points.

Enlarge Image

Associated Press
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., looks on as President Barack Obama makes
remarks on government contracts.

Nor can Mr. Obama count on winning the support of 9% of Republicans—or
roughly 3.7 million—as he did in 2008 (according to exit polls). If he
instead wins the same 6% of Republicans as Sen. John Kerry did in
2004, then 1.25 million Obama Republicans would be subtracted from the
president's column and added to Mr. Romney's. That would narrow Mr.
Obama's popular-vote margin to 3.6 million.

According to the exit polls, Mr. Obama won independents by eight
points in 2008 (52% vs. 44% for Mr. McCain). But the July 1
CNN/Opinion Research poll showed Mr. Romney winning independents by
seven points, 49% to 42%. The June 24 Gallup poll found Mr. Romney up
by one among independents, 43% to 42%. Independents will shift back
and forth, but if they split 49% to 49% (with the rest going to minor
candidates), then Mr. Obama's vote total would be shaved by 1.1
million and Mr. Romney's would grow by an equal amount, cutting the
president's margin to 1.4 million.

Among voters age 65 years or older, Mr. Obama lagged behind Mr. McCain
by eight points, 45% to 53%. That margin has doubled to 16 points (41%
vs. 57%) in the July 1 CNN/Opinion Research. In the June 24 Gallup,
the gap among seniors is 15 points, 39% to 54%. A big gap in November
implies that Mr. Obama would lose some undetermined number of
Democratic or independent seniors.

Mr. Obama also has a problem with middle-class voters. In the June 24
Gallup, he led among those making up to $36,000 a year by 51% to 39%,
and he trailed among those making $36,000-$90,000 by 44% to 51%, both
well behind his 2008 pace.

Finally, Mr. Obama faces real challenges in generating the turnout he
needs from blacks, Hispanics and young people.

If the turnout of African American voters this fall is just a
half-point less than in the last election, Mr. Obama would lose
roughly 700,000 votes. With black unemployment at 14.4%, that's a real
possibility.

Mr. Obama captured Hispanics by 67% to 31% in 2008. But the June 24
NBC/Wall Street Journal/Telemundo poll found Latino "interest in this
election remains far below 2008 levels." Even after Mr. Obama's June
15 decree exempting young illegal immigrants from deportation, his
approval rating among Hispanics is down to 58%. In the June 25 Gallup
poll, four in 10 Hispanic voters list unemployment and economic
growth as their greatest concern. This is no surprise, since Latino
unemployment is 11%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Another group vital to Mr. Obama's 2008 victory—young people—are now
less enthusiastic about voting and about Mr. Obama. According to a
June 24 NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, Mr. Obama leads Mr. Romney among
them by 23 points—11 points less than Mr. Obama's margin over Mr.
McCain. If this holds up, it would cost Mr. Obama up to 1.25 million
votes.

Still, Romney isn't home free. To win 270 Electoral College votes, he
will have to keep Republicans energized, increase his support among
independents, seniors and the middle class, and make inroads among
Hispanics and young voters. To do that, he will need to do much more
than just criticize Mr. Obama's many failures.

The closer Nov. 6 gets, the more pressure there will be on the GOP
challenger to offer a principled, practical, detailed governing
vision. He has many important policies on his website. He could cite
them more consistently in his speeches and point voters to them in his
campaign ads.

That doesn't mean rolling out everything right now. If Team Romney
were to do that, the media will declare it old news by Labor Day. But
to close the sale, Mr. Romney needs to be perceived on Election Day as
the man with a plan.

Mr. Rove is the former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to
President George W. Bush.



To: Michael Mc Donough who wrote (75388)7/12/2012 12:56:21 AM
From: Hope Praytochange2 Recommendations  Respond to of 103300
 
In Obama's Chicago, A Trayvon Martin Every Day

Posted 07/10/2012 06:51 PM ET

Urban Decay: When more Americans are killed in the president's hometown than in Afghanistan, even the media take notice. When will the president notice the carnage in the city run by his former chief of staff?

People are dying fast and furiously in Chicago, so much so that it caught the CBS eye and prompted "Evening News" anchor Scott Pelley to sit down Monday night with Rahm Emanuel, President Obama's former chief of staff and mayor of this monument to progressive decay, and ask a very pertinent question.

"I got a letter from a viewer the other day who asked us why we were spending so much time at 'The Evening News' covering Afghanistan when more people were dying in Chicago," Pelley said. "Why is the murder rate up 30%?"

Pelley put the number of murders in Chicago at 275 so far this year. On Monday alone, nine young people were shot in suspected gang-related violence, the Chicago Sun-Times reported.

Emanuel responded that crimes such as burglary, armed robbery and theft are down 10%. This is true, but it's small comfort to the parents of Heaven Sutton, 7, who was killed as she tried to dodge bullets fired from the guns of gangbangers. She was selling snow cones at the time.

Heaven didn't get quite the attention of Trayvon Martin, the Florida teenager killed by neighborhood watch member George Zimmerman. When perceived racism can be invoked as a cause of death, headlines blare. When it happens in a city beset by liberalism's failures, crickets chirp.

Mayor Emanuel announced Monday that he's devoting another $4 million to tear down vacant buildings where gang members live and store guns and drugs. Structurally sound buildings will be boarded up. But why are they vacant and boarded up? Why did 200,000 people flee Chicago in the past decade?

Chicago, like Illinois, is overtaxed and overregulated, a climate that attracts neither businesses nor people. It was the ideological incubator for a community organizer who would become president and blame all of America's problems on those who worked hard and succeeded.

Subscribe to the IBD Editorials Podcast

Emanuel told Pelley that in addition to being a law enforcement issue, "it's about values. As I said then (when a 7-year-old Heaven was shot and killed last month), who raised you? How were you raised?" And by whom, we might add. Decades of progressive liberalism that started with LBJ's Great Society did much to destroy the black family in America.



To: Michael Mc Donough who wrote (75388)7/12/2012 12:57:47 AM
From: Hope Praytochange2 Recommendations  Respond to of 103300
 
Next Recession Won't Be Bush's, But Obama's

Posted 06:43 PM ET

Slump: Even as the White House pats itself on the back for a nonexistent economic recovery, new data suggest things are taking a turn for the worse. Make no mistake: This will be Barack Obama's recession, not George Bush's.

'I think we're in recession already," says Lakshman Achuthan, co-founder of the widely respected Economic Cycle Research Institute, a nonpartisan economic think tank dedicated to timing the global economy's business cycles.

How can it tell? The ECRI looks at factory output, employment, income and sales. "When you look at those four measures," Achuthan told Bloomberg TV this week, "they're rolling over."

And ECRI's isn't the only indicator headed South.

As IBD noted earlier this week, the June Small Business Index, put out by the nation's premier small-business group, the National Federation of Independent Business, fell three points in June to 93 — the biggest drop in two years, and the lowest reading for the index since last October. For the record, the index stood at 94 when the U.S. entered the last recession in 2007.

Even more worrisome, the NFIB's jobs index fell for the first time this year, a truly bad sign since small businesses account for at least two-thirds of all job growth.

Still another key indicator, the Purchasing Managers Index, fell to 49.7 in June, down sharply from the 55.8 a year earlier and signaling economic contraction.

Get the picture? Bit by bit, the economy seems to be slipping back into recession.

Subscribe to the IBD Editorials Podcast

In the second quarter, businesses added just 75,000 jobs a month, the worst three-month stretch since 2010. And unemployment of 8.2% is way understated. Even the Labor Department says that once you count discouraged workers, real unemployment is 14.9%.

First-quarter GDP growth was a meager 1.9%. Given the abrupt slowing in job growth, many economists say that might be the high point for GDP growth this year. And some, like ECRI's Achuthan, see recession.

Why is this happening? Obamanomics, with its excessive spending, $16 trillion in debt and crushing regulations, is squeezing the life from the private sector.

Worst of all, Obama's renewed threat to raise taxes on families earning more than $250,000 a year could hit 1.2 million small businesses, a new Heritage Foundation study says, all but ending job growth.

Yet, following last week's dismal jobs report, Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz declared herself "pretty happy," while Obama's top economic adviser Alan Krueger said the economy "is continuing to heal."

It's clear the economy isn't thriving under Obamanomics. Yet Obama doesn't change course. Ideologically, for the left, there's too much at stake.

If the economy goes back in the tank, Democrats will again blame George W. Bush. But if we have another recession, this one will be all Obama's. He's earned it.