SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Reuben who wrote (23402)11/26/1997 8:59:00 PM
From: hpeace  Respond to of 176387
 
cpq's inventory raise is planned,
it's another gamble of a life time like they did in 1994.

on another subject
hotlink through here
for the whole enchillda again
thread, hotsite is working again.
after you go into the hotlink.
hotlink again and put in atml or another stk.
exchange2000.com



To: Paul Reuben who wrote (23402)11/26/1997 10:04:00 PM
From: Meathead  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
Paul - that article is somewhat confusing. Dell states that
only 1-2% of their business goes thru the reseller channel.
Ekhard states it's more. Some analysts have SWAG'd it as
high as 20%. The article mentions inventory surplus in the
channel for Dell only in the first paragraph and then goes
on to mainly talk about Compaq. Strange.

While resellers do move some systems for Dell (they need each
other to facilitate sales into certain accounts), resellers
don't "stock up" on any significant amount of Dell systems
in anticipation of a forecasted demand from their major accounts.
It seems illogical as they'd get burned on the rapid price
cuts initiated by Dell every few weeks. I wish the article
was more specific...

MEATHEAD



To: Paul Reuben who wrote (23402)11/28/1997 12:37:00 PM
From: jbn3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Paul,

But now there are mounting concerns that Compaq Computer Corp. and Dell Computer Corp. are building up unusually large inventory surpluses in the channel.

"in the channel" ??????

3



To: Paul Reuben who wrote (23402)1/7/1998 6:29:00 PM
From: Paul Reuben  Respond to of 176387
 
In case these weren't posted here before:

www5.zdnet.com

techweb.com