Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Metacomet who wrote (193863)	7/14/2012 1:34:00 PM
From: Steve Lokness	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 543140

<<<<So, to summarize your thinking as presented: Obama, since he is no Teddy Roosevelt is no better than Romney?>>>> I would summarize my thoughts like this; ......Obama had a chance to do what was right for the people who elected him but instead, unlike Roosevelt, he missed that chance while he had it and the end result of that of that missed opportunity is a more dangerous banking system than when he took office. Not only are they more dangerous - because they are even bigger - but their lack of a moral rudder almost guarantees more troubles down the road. Would Romney be better? I haven't a clue but maybe? As far as the control banks have on America, I doubt he could have done - or would have done - worse.