SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Solyndra Scandal -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: d[-_-]b who wrote (530)7/15/2012 8:04:17 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1400
 
Message 28268898



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (530)7/24/2012 10:22:26 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1400
 
Obama Hits Fundraiser With Former Adviser Who Approved Solyndra Loan…


(ABC News) — At an exclusive re-election fundraiser tonight, President Obama hobnobbed with 60 of his wealthiest supporters, including two figures at the center of the Solyndra loan controversy.

Steve Westly, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist, was one of the first to raise red flags about the administration’s support for a $500 million loan to Solyndra, the solar energy start-up that later went bankrupt. He wrote directly to senior Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett in 2010 to raise concerns about the company’s viability ahead of the president’s high-profile visit that year.

Matt Rogers, a former senior adviser at the Department of Energy, played a key role in approving Solyndra’s loan as part of the stimulus plan.

Both men were spotted by White House print pool reporter Darren Samuelsohn of Politico at the Piedmont, Calif., home of Quinn Delaney and Wayne Jordan, who were hosting the $35,800-a-head event.


weaselzippers.us



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (530)8/2/2012 3:14:15 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1400
 
Emails: Solyndra took sales pitch directly to Obama
‘Getting business from Uncle Sam’ was key for company


By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

Finances had become so dire at Solyndra in the spring of 2010 as President Obama toured the federally-backed solar panel maker in California that company officials began viewing the government not just as a lender but as a customer big enough to lift the company out of a growing financial hole, according to documents.

“Getting business from Uncle Sam is a principal element of Solyndra’s channel strategy,” one investor wrote in an email months after Mr. Obama’s May 2010 tour of the now-bankrupt company, according details of an investigative report Thursday by Republicans on the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

The now bankrupt company’s founder, Chris Gronet, “spoke very openly to Obama about the need for installation of Solyndra’s rooftop solar panels on U.S. government buildings,” Tom Baruch, founder of CMEA Capital, an investor, wrote to another Solyndra official.


“I heard Obama actually promise Chris he would look into it when he got back to Washington,” the email continued.


“The point is that the government has to pay for energy no matter what. The capital funding to deploy a lot of rooftop solar on government buildings (say $300 million) just falls off the table in Washington anyway.”

The report chronicles Solyndra’s rapid decline, noting that when discussions about a second government loan fell through, the company saw government contracts as a way to stay afloat.

The report also says the White House had been told about the company’s shaky finances.

Even when Solyndra closed on a more than $500 million loan in September 2009, the company was scrambling to get more loan money, according to the report.

“The Bank of Washington continues to help us,” Mr. Gronet wrote in an email to a colleague after the loan deal.

But privately, at least one investor was concerned, writing in an email that while Solyndra won a loan of more than $500 million, it had revenues of less than $100 million and wasn’t yet profitable: “… while that’s good for us, I can’t imagine it’s a good way for the government to use taxpayer money…”

All the while, officials both in the government and company were publicly praising Solyndra’s prospects.

Last year, The Washington Times reported that months before Solyndra’s collapse, former Department of Energy official Jonathan Silver was insisting that the company was headed in the right direction.

“This is a company that doubled their revenues and essentially doubled them again, year over year,” he said in an April 2011 interview with SNL Renewable Energy Weekly, a trade publication.

But the congressional report paints a different picture, noting that during the same month, the former chief financial officer for the DOE, Steve Isakowitz, had emailed a colleague about a meeting he had with Mr. Silver about a report from Solyndra’s auditors on the company’s shaky finances.

While Mr. Silver noted the filing was “expected”, Mr. Isakowitz wrote, “he admitted his monitoring is currently inadequate so he wouldn’t know if things were indeed deteriorating.”

Meanwhile, the White House pushed back Thursday against the Republicans’ findings.

A White House spokesman, Eric Schultz, said the “215,000 pages of documents, 14 committee staff briefings, five congressional hearings, 72,000 pages from Solyndra investors and committee interview with George Kaiser affirms what we said on day one: This was a merit-based decision made by the Department of Energy.”

He said Republicans won’t say how much the investigation has cost taxpayers and should be focused on legislation to create jobs and grow the economy.

washingtontimes.com



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (530)8/3/2012 2:15:28 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1400
 
Democrats fight GOP report on Solyndra, ask how much investigation cost

By Daniel Strauss - 08/02/12
thehill.com


Democrats are fighting a Republican report on the GOP investigation of solar firm Solyndra with plans to release their own report and call attention to how much the investigation cost taxpayers.

On Thursday House Republicans made public their report from 18 months of investigating Solyndra, the failed solar energy company that struggled to survive even after the Energy Department gave it a $535 million loan guarantee.

The report called Solyndra a "cautionary tale" of the dangers "that come when the Federal government plays investor, tries to keep a company and industry afloat with subsidies and attempts to pick the winners and losers in a particular marketplace."

In response, White House spokesman Eric Schultz said because Republicans won't note how much the Solyndra investigation cost, they should focus attention elsewhere.

House Democrats plan to also release their own report soon.


"This is month eighteen of this Congressional investigation and everything disclosed in the 215,000 pages of documents, 14 committee staff briefings, 5 Congressional hearings, 72,000 pages from Solyndra investors, and Committee interview with George Kaiser, affirms what we said on day one: this was a merit based decision made by the Department of Energy," Schultz said in a statement. "As Republicans won’t answer how much investigation has cost taxpayers, we believe they should instead be focused on legislation to creating jobs and grow the economy."

The GOP report says that an analyst for the White House warned as early as the beginning of January that the Obama administration could have liquidated Solyndra in order to regain some the money invested in the company instead of going ahead with a much-criticized restructuring plan that same year.

But the report did not directly reinforce recent Republican claims that members of the Obama administration were motivated to prop up Solyndra through a loan as a way of paying back campaign donors.



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (530)8/4/2012 1:14:55 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1400
 
HARRY REID HELPS CHINESE SOLAR FIRM REPRESENTED -- BY HIS SON!

Costs, conflicts arise in Reid push for green power

by Steve Sebelius Aug. 3, 2012 | 2:06 a.m.
lvrj.com


Say this about U.S. Sen. Harry Reid: He really believes in renewable energy.

Reid has beat up NV Energy pretty good in recent years. In the closing days of the George W. Bush administration, Reid blocked plans to build coal-fired power plants in Nevada. He said in April on the "Nevada Newsmakers" show, "I don't think NV Energy has done enough to allow renewable energy to thrive."

But that same month, NV Energy reported it had exceeded its state-imposed green-energy requirement of 15 percent by purchasing 16.7 percent of its power from renewable sources. And that was in spite of the Public Utilities Commission rejecting a handful of renewable contracts in July 2011, saying the company hadn't justified the purchases were necessary to meet its quota.

Now Reid is pushing for a Chinese company he played a key role in recruiting to Nevada, ENN Mojave Energy LLC. The company plans a billion-dollar solar energy manufacturing and generating plant near Laughlin, but an ambitious development schedule is being threatened by a lack of green power customers.

Steve Tetreault quoted Reid in Tuesday's Review-Journal saying the project "would start tomorrow if NV Energy would purchase the power," but the company "has not been willing to work on this and that's such a shame."

Reid added: "NV Energy is a regulated monopoly. They control 95 percent of all the electricity that is produced in Nevada and they should go along with this."

They're not, at least not yet.

And there are some legitimate reasons: Power costs are passed directly to consumers, and green energy currently costs more than power generated by coal-fired or natural-gas burning plants. State law mandates NV Energy buy power as cheaply as possible, except when it's required to buy more-expensive green energy to meet state-mandated quotas. But the more green energy you buy, the higher bills climb.

NV Energy has already met its quota, and the PUC has already turned the company down when it proposed contracts that would have exceeded quotas. And when the company does buy power - which it plans to do next in 2014 - it does so by analyzing competitive bids.

Reid says those weak excuses. He said in that April interview that if "NV Energy wanted to do more with renewable energy, they could."

There's another factor, however, one more personal to Reid: His son, Rory Reid, is one of the attorneys for the ENN Mojave Energy project. A Reid spokeswoman said the senator did not suggest Reid's firm - Lionel, Sawyer & Collins - to ENN, nor has the elder Reid spoken to this son about the deal. (Reid imposed a strict ban on family members lobbying his office in 2003 after the Los Angeles Times asked him about lobbying by three of his four sons.)

But success for ENN in finding customers helps Rory Reid, and its failure could cost him a client. It's an undeniable conflict that Harry Reid should keep in mind as he twists arms at the PUC and NV Energy, lest he earn himself an ethics complaint.

Reid's office points out developing more renewable power will create jobs in Nevada that can't be outsourced and reduce the nation's dependence on foreign oil. (It's also good for the environment.)

And while Reid said in that April interview that "Every day that goes by, the ability to produce solar [energy] is cheaper," the fact is, it's more expensive than coal and natural gas right now. Someday, green power may be cheaper than anything else. But that day isn't here yet, and until it arrives, Reid must mind the costs and the conflicts.



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (530)8/12/2012 2:21:48 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1400
 
Another Obama-funded electric car goes up in flames, endangers entire neighborhood with massive blaze

directorblue.blogspot.com

Fisker Automotive, which absconded with $530 million of your money to build $100,000 electric cars in Finland, has encountered a series of all-too-predictable disasters.

First came word that under certain random circumstances, such as letting the battery run down, the entire vehicle could become "bricked" -- or permanently ruined.




Next came the mysterious fires.
After this particular blaze in May (above), the local fire department determined the origin was the owner's two week-old Fisker Karma electric vehicle.




Yesterday, another Fisker spontaneously combusted. The owner parked in a Woodside, CA parking lot, entered a grocery store to shop, and returned shortly thereafter to a burning vehicle.




Like the prior incident, the car was new, had never been damaged in a collision, was not plugged in and was not running.


It is worth noting that the car was parked in a heavily wooded area also suffering from a drought; the Fisker could therefore have touched off a significant wildfire. I wonder what the carbon footprint of a wildfire is?

The good news for Fisker? The problem could be in the battery, which is not made by Fisker, but is manufactured by a different company called A123 systems.

The bad news for taxpayers?
A123 systems received a quarter of a billion dollars in Obama green grant money.

How many billions of dollars has this administration flushed down the toilet in pursuit of
the enviro-Statist agenda? Hopefully the investigations will begin in January of next year.



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (530)8/21/2012 12:56:09 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1400
 
Obama Administration Continues to Fail on Energy Policy

by Ben Howe Tuesday, August 14th
redstate.com


One would think that one of the primary requirements of energy independence would be having the ability to collect the energy through which one becomes independent by using. Somehow, this logic escapes the Obama administration as evidenced by their “Five-Year Plan.” However, if their goal was to diminish opportunities for energy resources, they’ve done a magnificent job.

It is pretty well established that there is oil in the Gulf of Mexico and in the Arctic. We should drill there until it runs dry and the administration puts forth the appearance that they agree on this point as they have been kind enough to allow additional drilling there. Specifically, they’ve agreed to set up 12 lease auctions in the Gulf and 3 more in the Arctic. Very nice of them but these are known quantities and probably don’t qualify as the savior of energy independence at this point. For that, we’d need to explore new areas. However, true exploration is not on the agenda.

The five-year offshore lease plan focuses on allowing oil and gas development in already-explored areas of the Gulf of Mexico and the Arctic, while ruling out lease sales in Atlantic waters, despite pressure from some Virginia officials eager for exploration off state shores.

You would think that with all of the information collected by the Interior Department on these matters that the administration would’ve come to a different conclusion. You would also think that the Interior Department would have collected information. Unfortunately that is not the case, and the Governors of 9 coastal states are not very pleased, sending a letter to the President asking for an explanation for the lack of communication.

…the administration fails to expand adequate access to resource-abundant areas in the Arctic and fails to establish leasing in the Mid- and South-Atlantic. Both of these decisions appear to have been made without proper consultation from the states, as required by the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, and without sufficient explanation for the reversal in decision from previous plans.

Furthermore, the administration continues to hide behind “studies” to block further drilling in the Arctic. In a sneaky move, the administration put forth the “ possibility of 3 auctions for rights to drill in waters near Alaska.” But this does nothing to stop them from shutting down more areas in order to create “study areas.” This is known to most people as “pandering to environmental whackos” and the letter mentions this as well.

In the Arctic, the proposed plan allows for only three lease sales in the Arctic OCS – one in the Chukchi Sea, one in Beaufort Sea, and one in the Cook Inlet – all of which appear to be postponed by one-year from the date proposed in the draft plan. The final plan further removes millions of acres in the Arctic from leasing in order to form “study areas,” raising the likelihood that these Arctic lease sales may never occur. The Department of the Interior did not reach out to the State of Alaska for input on these decisions, as is legally required.

The letter was signed by Govs. Bobby Jindal (Louisiana), Sean Parnell (Alaska), Rick Perry (Texas), Phil Bryant (Mississippi), Robert Bentley (Alabama), Nikki Haley (South Carolina), & Robert McDonnell (Virginia). You know…basically everyone we like. Full text of the letter here.

So, not to beat a drum to death here but let me take this opportunity to point out yet again what is at stake in this election. We’ve already seen the Keystone Pipeline get derailed. We’ve seen the coal industry destroying MACT Rule, we know about the tyrannical EPA and here we have what appears to be, either through malice or incompetence, a framework which ensures that energy independence will remain out of reach for the United States.

We are on a disastrous energy path that must be altered. There is only one way to alter it.



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (530)8/23/2012 4:25:27 PM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations  Respond to of 1400
 
Watchdog who exonerated Obama on energy loans now an Obama donor

August 23, 2012 Associated Press





  • WASHINGTON – A veteran Wall Street executive who performed an independent review that exonerated the Obama administration's program of loans to energy companies contributed $52,500 to re-elect President Barack Obama in the months since completing his work, according to an Associated Press review of campaign records. The executive defended the integrity of his conclusions and said he decided to donate to Obama after his work was finished.

    The campaign contributions to Obama started just weeks after Herbert M. Allison Jr., in congressional testimony in March, minimized concerns that the Energy Department was at high risk in more than $23 billion in federal loans awarded to green energy firms. Two weeks later, Allison began giving to the Obama campaign. His contributions to Obama and the Democratic National Committee totaled $52,500 by last month. Allison previously was the former head of the government's mass purchase of toxic Wall Street assets.

    Allison did not make any Obama donations during his four-month review of Energy Department loans, and he has a long history of working with and giving money to both political parties. However, Republican Party officials and congressional critics of the energy loans said Allison's donations to Obama raise doubts about his objectivity and highlight his decision not to assess multimillion-dollar loans to two companies that later went into bankruptcy - the troubled Solyndra solar panel company and Beacon Power, an energy storage firm.

    Allison's report, completed in February and touted by the White House, acknowledged that the Energy Department could lose as much as $3 billion in loans, but it concluded that was far less than the $10 billion set aside by Congress for high-risk companies. The review did not assess the two bankrupt firms because those loans were no longer current. Allison told Congress that "DOE has negotiated protections in the loan agreements that enable it to cut off further funding and to demand more credit protection if projects do not meet targets." He also urged the Energy Department to toughen its oversight.

    Allison defended the integrity of his review in an interview with The Associated Press. He said that he did not make the decision to back a presidential candidate until after he had finished his work and that his selection was approved by Energy Department lawyers before he began his review last October to "ensure there was no hint of bias or conflict of interest."

    "I was on the record with the White House that this had to be completely independent review and they agreed," he said Wednesday in a telephone interview from his home in Westport, Conn. "It didn't hew to anybody's political suasion, I think, and it had to be fully factual or it wouldn't be credible."

    Allison said he made his decision to support Obama after he saw "his administration in action and decided that I believe broadly in the things he's trying to accomplish."

    Allison gave $2,500 to the Obama campaign on March 29, two weeks after he testified to the Senate Energy and Commerce Committee about his review. In May, he gave $15,000 to the Obama Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee that supports both the president's re-election campaign and the Democratic National Committee. Allison gave the same amount to the fund again in June and then $20,000 more in July.

    Allison has donated money to both parties, but his gifts in the past have tended to be much smaller than his current contributions, typically no more than $1,000 or $2,000, according to Federal Election Commission records. Allison explained his larger donations to the Obama campaign by saying "there's a hell of a lot more money in politics today than in years past and I decided I could go this route."

    Allison has given to GOP figures such as Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma and Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, and to Democrats such as Rep. Carolyn Maloney of New York and former Nebraska Sen. Bob Kerrey. Allison's presidential preferences have been mostly Republicans - Sen. John McCain of Arizona and former Sen. Bob Dole of Kansas. He also gave $2,300 to Obama in 2008, a year before Obama appointed Allison as an assistant treasury secretary.

    The White House and the Obama campaign defended Allison, saying his donations did not taint his work as independent reviewer of the loans program. They pointed to his repeated hiring over the past two decades by Republican presidential administrations and GOP campaigns as justification that Allison had the independence to oversee troubled government programs.

    "Mr. Allison was selected to do this study because of his relevant expertise and he is a public servant widely respected by Democrats and Republicans alike," said Eric Schultz, a White House spokesman.

    Schultz added that Allison's "analysis of the DOE loan portfolio was thorough and reliable as evident by additional independent reports affirming his findings." The Obama campaign said, "Having completed an independent assignment does not cost him his right to continue participating in the political progress on behalf of many candidates, as he has in the past."

    A former Merrill Lynch executive, Allison worked for several Republican administrations and earned a reputation for tackling troubled federal programs. During McCain's failed 2000 presidential run, he served as national finance chairman and was rumored to be McCain's choice to become treasury secretary if he had won.

    Allison was named by President George W. Bush to head Fannie Mae after the quasi-government home lending agency was placed in conservatorship in 2008 following the Wall Street collapse. A year later, Obama named Allison as an assistant treasury secretary to oversee the Troubled Asset Relief Program that Bush had created to stabilize Wall Street banks and investment houses reeling with toxic debt.

    During his work at the Treasury Department, Allison was among top officials who crossed swords with TARP Inspector General Neil Barofsky, who accused the department of failing to properly track government bailout money given to banks and investment houses. Barofsky declined to comment about his dealings with Allison.

    Allison left the Treasury Department in 2010 but returned last year to head up the review of energy loans. The White House agreed to the review in the wake of mounting Republican criticism after Solyndra, a California firm, went belly up. The bankruptcy cost U.S. taxpayers $528 million in lost loans.

    Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., who chairs the House Energy Committee's oversight subcommittee, said Allison's donations to the Obama campaign back up GOP warnings this year that the White House review was suspect. Stearns said Allison's "financial support for the Obama campaign undermines (his) credibility and shows once again that the president did not want a careful, independent review of his risky green jobs scheme."

    Allison's role as a large Obama donor "raises serious questions about an administration that puts campaign cash before taxpayer money," said Joe Pounder, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee.

    Allison declined to say whether he will keep donating to Obama. "Next time around," he said, "I might support a Republican."

    Read more: foxnews.com



    To: d[-_-]b who wrote (530)8/27/2012 8:45:09 PM
    From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1400
     
    GM to suspend Chevy Volt production...

    GM to suspend Chevy Volt production...



    To: d[-_-]b who wrote (530)9/10/2012 2:50:50 PM
    From: joseffy2 Recommendations  Respond to of 1400
     
    Reuters: GM Is Losing Nearly $50K on Each Electric Volt

    Reuters: GM Is Losing Nearly $50K on Each Electric Volt Read More



    To: d[-_-]b who wrote (530)11/15/2012 4:00:36 PM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 1400
     
    NISSAN abandons this year's electric vehicle sales target...

    NISSAN abandons this year's electric vehicle sales target...



    To: d[-_-]b who wrote (530)11/20/2012 11:58:05 PM
    From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1400
     
    White House Gave $1 Million To Battery Maker A123 The Day It Filed For Bankruptcy

    Ayesha Rascoe, Reuters | Nov. 16, 2012


    WASHINGTON, Nov 16 ( Reuters) - The Obama administration provided struggling battery maker A123 Systems Inc with nearly $1 million on the day it filed for bankruptcy, the company told lawmakers investigating its government grant.

    The company, which makes lithium ion batteries for electric cars, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection last month after a rescue deal with Chinese auto parts supplier Wanxiang Group fell apart.

    That same day, Oct. 16, A123 received a $946,830 payment as part of its $249 million clean energy grant from the Energy Department, the company said in a letter obtained by Reuters to Republican Senators John Thune and Chuck Grassley.



    Read more: businessinsider.com



    To: d[-_-]b who wrote (530)11/15/2013 1:30:14 PM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 1400
     
    Report: DOE Withheld Data on Bankrupt Green Energy Company






    To: d[-_-]b who wrote (530)11/15/2013 1:31:30 PM
    From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1400
     
    Third Tesla Model S catches fire

    .................................................................................


    Third TESLA fire in five weeks...
    ..................................................................................


    Third Tesla Model S fire raises fresh questions, NHTSA query



    To: d[-_-]b who wrote (530)11/15/2013 1:49:00 PM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 1400
     
    · Antarctic Sea Ice Didn’t Get The Memo That It Was Supposed To Melt