SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (92536)7/16/2012 7:01:57 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219981
 
It is going to be the best thing or mankind,women getting ahead if us.



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (92536)7/16/2012 7:41:35 AM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 219981
 
BS, that is just more BS "science". Also, you have obviously not understood what I have written. As usual, the actual data was not given, so we are unable to point out the obvious faults in their thinking. But here's my prediction. They tested young women, probably as young as 18 or maybe even younger. Then they compared those results with the same tests on men, including young men, probably as young as 18 or maybe even younger.

See if you can figure out why that testing would give the results they got and why their conclusion is bung.

And of course they do NOT use the same tests as those of 100 years ago so it's not surprising the results vary from those obtained in earlier decades.

Also, Flynn makes the usual mistake - thinks that intelligence comes from experiencing complexity and because the world is supposedly more complex, women get higher intelligence because they "multitask".

Mqurice