Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (92555)	7/16/2012 11:36:40 AM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Respond to of 220017

Flynn is not too bad. It's the journalists who interpret scientific information who get things wrong, to serve their silly ideas. Note that the report we saw was not from Flynn, it was from some ignorant people who most likely misquoted him. Unlike Climate Doomster "Scientists", when Flynn found data which did not match his expectations about intelligence [which led to The Flynn Effect], he accepted the data and revised his ideas to fit the facts. The Climate Alarmists adjust the facts to suit their computer models [including hiding the decline and ditching data]. But Flynn does overly subscribe to the idea that intelligence is made, not inherited. If intelligence isn't inherited, there would be educated chimps coming up with Relativity Theory extensions. Don't be shy about thinking for yourself. "Experts" do not have a monopoly on either perception or thinking. You would have to be quite ignorant of swarms of expert opinions which have been reversed over the decades to think that experts have the dinkum oil on what's going on. Global Alarmism and The Greenhouse Effect is just another scientific "fact" being revised in the face of recalcitrant nature which refuses to match Doomster computer models. Mqurice