Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: T L Comiskey who wrote (194094)	7/16/2012 5:19:08 PM
From: epicure	Respond to of 543151

Probably. And with most Americans not having an employer who will contribute anything to their retirement, I don't think Romney's retirement fund gymnastics are going to make him a popular boy. He is sort of the poster child for why more laws are needed to spread the wealth of the 1%. I mean it's not like Romney created that many jobs shoveling all that money away (although no doubt he created some jobs in the tax havens he frequents). The republicans may hate government, but at least it can put people to work with money that would otherwise be piling up in the Caymans. Now do I find it horrendous that we might get infrastructure created, or food inspectors, or even bureaucrats from money that would otherwise be holed up in a tax haven? No I do not. Stick it to the 1%- they can take it. Use the money wisely, and get those freaking drug criminals out of prison. Doing just those two things would probably balance our budget. Can America tolerate those two things? I think it can.