To: John who wrote (59047 ) 7/17/2012 1:32:47 PM From: one_less 3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 59480 Chump? LOL! Your hypocrisy is interesting. Chump is an appropriate descriptor for a person who goes along with a bigoted agenda in a doltish way. Someone who is easily lead by corrupt individuals because they demonstrate a strong need for acceptance and belonging. It is especially noticeable in people who violate common principles of decency in order to get strokes from their peers, which strengthens the feelings of belongingness while exposing character flaws. The number of times you can be seen kissing up to people on the The Obama Disaster thread and the number of times you join in dog packing on individuals who are unable to defend themselves (banned posters, public figures, etc) is very telling. The term is simply an accurate and now qualified characterisation. What hypocrisy? Are you cognizant of what you're posting? Yes. Your baseless attacks and reckless charges against me and others in The Obama Disaster forum speak volumes about who you are and the nonsense in which you believe. I have not attacked you. I have called you on indecent and unjust behavior. That you view exposure as an attack is very telling. I have also provided the basis for my comments. There is no defense for such conduct, so I can understand why you are having some difficulty. It would be better for you just to man up but I understand change can be difficult to near impossible for people who are caught up in the group think of hatred. Just the same... "Others?" This has been a very personal discussion just between the two of us. By insisting that I have been addressing the others on TOD, you are showing just how much you need to belong. There is nothing wrong with belonging but on matters of principle it is best to make your stand as an individual, so you can own principle rather than violating it. Clearly you are not able to do that. As I suspected and posted earlier, it is my strong perception that you represent the prototypical leftist, with a strong inclination toward liberalism, socialism, Marxism, communism, and egalitarianism, all coupled with a deep sense of self-loathing. You are repeating a baseless (hypocritical) false allegation. That is obviously your lame attempt at an insult but you do understand people who are leftist liberal marxist communists egalitarian whatever would not be insulted. Since I am not any of those things, it just looks dumb and chumpish. I suppose you think that hurts my feelings or something, but I'm just guessing. I don't know for sure what you think. Those descriptors are about as far from accurate as you can get, so it just looks dumb and reinforces the notion that you are a total chump and a knuckledragging goofball. Too bad, I have a feeling you could be a better person if you tried. I'll give you the last word, Is that your tail between your leg? it is clear to me that you are not capable of a honest debate, nor are you capable of offering logical facts to support and defend your misguided views and leftist positions, I have been honest with you. I have presented facts in a reasoned and logical manner. You have not. What leftist positions? such as "Everyone could get by with a little less." It is a humorous pun on my name, which was _less before I made it one_less. I realise is wasted on humorless dolts.