SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 50% Gains Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KaiserSosze who wrote (109176)7/18/2012 5:56:08 AM
From: ElroyRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 118717
 
Yeah, the preliminary Q2 results don't look "AGNC super duper" at all.

Book value up only 1% or so to $29.35. That's not too good at all. I read a research report the other day estimating that AGNC's book value might have risen as high as $35 (seriously), so I think anyone paying attention to change in book value will see a 1% gain as a disappointment. CYS reported preliminary Q2 results before its offering a week ago, and its book value was estimated to be up 3%.

Spread income was only 94 cents, so AGNC didn't cover the $1.25 dividend.

Just comparing CYS and AGNC, it's hard to make the case for AGNC with these quarterly results. Assuming AGNC is $34.50 and CYS is $14.15.....

AGNC is at 1.17x book value whereas CYS is at 1.05x book value. Both yield ~14% if they maintain the latest dividend. CYS grew book value more than AGNC in the last reported Q. Both have just done offerings. Why buy AGNC rather than CYS here?

I don't know what it will take to pop the AGNC bubble, but it will still be expensive relative to all the other mREITs at 1.1x book, which would be a share price of #32.25.

If they can only grow the book value by 1% per quarter the justification for a premium rapidly vanishes. ARR at $7.35 yields 16% and is only at 1.08x Q1 book value, which has likely increased in Q2.

----

I think you made the right decision to sell, but we'll see. Lots of people love AGNC, so they may just ignore this and buy it back up?