Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sylvester80 who wrote (30671)	7/20/2012 3:49:16 PM
From: Lahcim Leinad	Respond to of 34857

Dude, you never even tried Windows Phones, so how do you know? You never even tried the greatest, best of ALL cameraphones, the Nokia 808 PureView. Why do you still believe anyone cares one iota bout the BS you spew?

To: sylvester80 who wrote (30671)	7/20/2012 4:01:24 PM
From: sense	2 Recommendations Respond to of 34857

It isn't a valid comparison. Note the DATES... and ask two questions... First, what PERCENT of the market did each of those numbers represent... at the TIME that the numbers WERE actually relevant ? Second, what was the real market and $ impact on the company of that number, at that time, in that market context ? If there is a strong parallel in the comparison in % and $/impact market terms... then it's a valid comparison. Instead, its a purposeful comparison of apples and oranges... deliberately presented out of context. You SERIOUSLY need to read those books I liked at Amazon, recently... That article tries to practice a simple sleight of hand by showing you the larger NUMBER in Lumia's shipped recently (with NOK losing $ on each one) in a comparison made with the smaller number others shipped back in 2007 to 2009... in a different context... when they were MAKING money on the products shipped ? You were suckered into thinking the larger number now... means "good" compared to the smaller number from a generation ago... which is exactly the reason the numbers were used as they were... intending to induce the error.

To: sylvester80 who wrote (30671)	7/20/2012 4:41:19 PM
From: sense	1 Recommendation Respond to of 34857

Then, if the focus addressed in justifying making that comparison is "the impact of a new ecosystem"... ? How do the numbers used... accomplish a "proof" ? Given NOK has already made it clear they've thrown that "old" OS out just after introducing it... how does it have any possible relevance in addressing what happens in the future ? Anyone seriously using that number... to argue that the number of Nokia products shipped to date... are a proof that the Windows BRAND is succeeding in generating ADDITIONAL appeal to consumers... meaning VALUE... because of the "ecosystem" benefits inherent in the OS ? LOL!!! I think that anyone saying that claim is supported by those numbers is lying...