Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : NNBM - SI Branch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Clappy who wrote (83939)	7/20/2012 5:16:14 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 104154

"It seemed that his thoughts seemed to get the country back to its roots." yup. Not sure whether 1865 or 1776. Bill of Rights OK? Maybe. Blacks = 3/5 person? he's not that bad. "I have been seeing both the Dems and Repubs doing what it best for big companies who fund their campaigns and are not really looking out for the people any more" That's a bit harsh. Most are millionaires, so ya gotta give them credit for looking out for their own bank accounts, too. Teabaggers want to get rid of everything that doesn't compromise the safety of their bods...military (too small, eh?), border guards, FBI, and maybe the airport inspectors. They haven't figured out they are screwing themselves, but, when asked, they hate the idea of that. They want to get rid of EPA, but don't want Chinese air quality. In the poll, Americans across all age groups and ideologies said by large margins that it was “unacceptable” to make significant cuts in entitlement programs in order to reduce the federal deficit. Even tea party supporters, by a nearly 2-to-1 margin, declared significant cuts to Social Security “unacceptable blogs.ajc.com