Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greatplains_guy who wrote (53066)	7/23/2012 2:36:37 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

<Obama did nothing to get us out of Iraq ahead of the schedule negotiated by President Bush.> The perception is he got us out much faster than McCain would have... that's who he ran against... I don't think McCain would disagree with that. Further... Rwingnutz were abusing Obama for his wanting to push up the schedule... so you'll just have to pound sand on that one. <Governor Romney never invaded anything> He's been clamouring to go into Syria... and he's much more likely to (see his foreign policy advisors) to attack Iran... see any of the many Ron Paul speeches on that. Again, you'll have to pound sand on that one too. <He saved the Salt Lake Olympics from bankruptcy.> A good friend of mine was on the committee... I was in Budapest with him during the announcement. If you had 1/2 a CLUE what the hell went on there you would shut like a clam. Personally I cant believe the whole thing hasn't come out... maybe I'll e-mail Barrack on that. :))) <So if you want fiscal prudence Romney must be your man.> Re-read original post... one attack on Iran would be more fiscally irresponsible than 20 year of Obama... again, go pound sand. DAK