SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 2MAR$ who wrote (28898)7/23/2012 7:17:22 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Respond to of 69300
 
No, it's not something. At least if "something" means how chemical laws would produce an information encoding system.



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (28898)7/23/2012 10:32:26 PM
From: Solon1 Recommendation  Respond to of 69300
 
"to illustrate the hazy, perhaps nonexistent, line between life and nonlife"

Yes, that line is a contrived one. Certainly a significant line for living things, though! But the living and the Not are sets within a larger set--The largest set being what Spinoza called "God"--although as a safe and socially acceptable metaphor for All That Is--rather than some strange person with an unkempt beard!

Interesting Evolutionary news today on that puzzling question of what terminated the existence of another hominid called the neanderthals. Why am I not surprised to find that they are( possibly) just another victim of the MIGHTY homo sapiens!

http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/07/neandertals-didnt-bite-the-volca.html?ref=em

"About 40,000 years ago, a huge volcanic eruption west of what is now Naples, Italy, showered ash over much of central and Eastern Europe. Some researchers have suggested that this super-eruption, combined with a sharp cold spell that hit the Northern Hemisphere at the same time, created a "volcanic winter" that did in the Neandertals. But a new study of microscopic particles of volcanic glass left behind by the explosion concludes that the eruption happened after the Neandertals were already mostly gone, putting the blame for their extinction on competition with modern humans. Why the Neandertals disappeared is one of archaeology's longest-running debates. Over the years, opinions have shifted back and forth between climate change, competition with modern humans, and combinations of the two. Earlier this year, the climate change contingent got a boost when a European team determined that the Italian eruption, known as the Campanian Ignimbrite (CI), was two to three times larger than previous estimates. The researchers calculated that ash and chemical aerosols released into the atmosphere by the eruption cooled the Northern Hemisphere by as much as 2°C for up to 3 years.

Modern humans entered Europe from Africa and possibly the Middle East around the time of the eruption and Neandertals' demise, give or take several thousand years. The timing is critical. If Neandertals began disappearing before the eruption, it could not be responsible for their extinction; if their demise began at the same time or shortly afterward, the correlation with climate might still hold.

With these issues in mind, a team of more than 40 researchers from across Europe, led by geographer John Lowe of Royal Holloway, University of London in Egham, U.K., used a new technique for detecting volcanic ash across a much larger area than previously possible. The new method relies on deposits of cryptotephra, tiny particles of volcanic glass that are invisible to the naked eye. Unlike visible ash deposits, which are found over a more limited range, the much lighter cryptotephra can penetrate and be recovered from far-flung archaeological sites as well as marine, lake, and marsh environments. Moreover, by analyzing the chemical composition of the microscopic particles, researchers can trace them back to specific volcanic eruptions, in this case the CI.

A Weekly Chat on the Hottest Topics in Science Thursdays 3 p.m. EDT

The team collected samples containing CI cryptotephra from four central European caves where stone tools and other artifacts typical of Neandertals and modern humans have been found. They also gathered the particles from a modern human site in Libya and from marshland and marine sites in Greece and the Aegean Sea. The results, the team argues in a paper published online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, are incompatible with the hypothesis that the CI was responsible for Neandertal extinction, at least in central Europe. The CI cryptotephra lie above, and so postdate, the transition from Neandertal to modern human stone tool types at all four central European sites, indicating that modern humans had replaced Neandertals before the catastrophic events of 40,000 years ago.

Moreover, analysis of tree pollen and other climatic indicators from the marsh and marine sediments confirmed that the CI was contemporaneous with a sharp cold spell called a Heinrich event, which is also often cited as a contributor to Neandertal extinction. So the data suggest that the eruption and the cold snap happened after the Neandertals had already vanished from central Europe.

"Climate was probably not directly responsible for Neandertal extinction, and catastrophic events most certainly were not," says co-author William Davies, an archaeologist at the University of Southampton, Avenue Campus, in the United Kingdom. That leaves competition with modern humans as the most likely culprit, the team contends.

Nevertheless, the authors concede that their results are only directly applicable to central and probably Eastern Europe, and not to Western Europe, where some researchers have claimed that Neandertals hung on until at least 35,000 years ago in Portugal and Spain. Because the team has not been able to find cryptotephra that far west, "we cannot rule out the survival of Neandertals post-CI and post Heinrich … in refugia like the Iberian Peninsula," says co-author Chris Stringer of the Natural History Museum in London. "But it must have been a very limited survival at best, as they headed to physical extinction."

The team's techniques offer new clues to the eruption, says Clive Finlayson, director of the heritage division at the Gibraltar Museum and head of the excavations at Gibraltar's caves, at the southern tip of Spain, where Neandertals may have survived until as late as 30,000 years ago. But Finlayson, an advocate of climate change as the key factor in Neandertal extinction, says the researchers have not proven their case. "We can only conclude from this that the eruption and subsequent climatic changes had no effect on Neandertals that were already extinct. To pretend that these results speak to other factors that may have generated the Neandertal extinction, which was a protracted process, is utter nonsense."



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (28898)7/23/2012 10:45:04 PM
From: Solon  Respond to of 69300
 
"Isn't that something , see previous post .."

Yes, it damn sure is!



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (28898)7/24/2012 1:50:22 AM
From: Solon1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
I guess Nature sort of knows a bit about survival!

"The fact that they're running toward the center reduces the chances of their being on the edge and being picked off by a predator," says King. It's a selfish behavior since each sheep puts the animals at the fringes of the flock at risk in order to save itself."

Now doesn't that sound a lot like people who do not wish to go to an imaginary place but will rejoice over sending others there! Something I remember about someone getting even with Ayn Rand years and years after her death...

news.sciencemag.org

"To escape a hungry wolf, a sheep doesn't have to outrun the wolf, just the other sheep in its flock. Many researchers think that such selfish behavior, not cooperation for the benefit of the whole crowd, shapes the movements of groups of animals. But the decades-old "selfish herd theory" has been hard to back up with data. Now, a detailed analysis of how a flock of sheep moves to avoid a sheepdog has found that the theory holds true. Each sheep heads to safety in the center of the flock, rather than running directly away from the dog.

"It's really difficult to measure 2D spatial information on large animals in the wild," says biologist Theodore Stankowich of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, who was not involved in the new work. "They've taken advantage of a unique opportunity to work with the sheep to answer these types of questions in a controlled environment."

Studies on seals, crabs, and pigeons have shown that those animals seem to herd for selfish reasons, but the data have often been crude. Biologist Andrew King and colleagues at the Royal Veterinary College of the University of London attached GPS backpacks to 46 sheep and to a trained Australian Kelpie dog. When they released the dog to herd the sheep, they recorded the location of each animal every second. Then, they analyzed the data to determine what factors influenced each sheep's path. The movements of the sheep, the researchers reveal today online in Current Biology, could be best predicted by the center of the flock. Rather than run in a line away from the dog, scatter in all directions, or follow their nearest neighbors, the sheep all hurried toward the flock's center. The sheep began to converge when the dog was 70 meters away. Even as the flock as a whole moved, each sheep continuously competed to be as near the middle as possible.

"The fact that they're running toward the center reduces the chances of their being on the edge and being picked off by a predator," says King. It's a selfish behavior since each sheep puts the animals at the fringes of the flock at risk in order to save itself.

The new observation helps back up hypotheses on the evolutionary pressures that have encouraged animals to group. In addition, further work could reveal how herding behaviors change when sheep are infected with neurodegenerative diseases such as scrapie, which kills sheep and can quickly spread throughout a flock if infected animals aren't quarantined. The results could lead to ways to detect infections earlier through behavioral monitoring, says King.

"These methods are an advance on previous efforts," says Stankowich. "I'd like to see the same technique applied to other large mammals." Even if sheep herd for selfish protection, the findings don't necessarily hold true for all animals.

And trained sheepdogs may not be the best mimic of a dangerous predator, King acknowledges. "It could be a downgraded level of threat, because it's something the sheep have experienced before," he says. The animals' response to a wolf, for example, could be different."