Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (22142)	11/27/1997 8:45:00 PM
From: shades	Respond to of 55532

The problem is that everyone has been bent on "selling" this stock soley on the basis of a stock squeeze that may or may not be justified. You are right, it may be and there was a KNOWN short position- if there was one- the mathematical probability states there were and are probably more, but short squeezes do not require fundamentals, wether they are good or bad has no meaning in a short squeeze and you will just not accept this and continue to insist that a short squeeze needs the fundamentals, RMIL could be TOTAL GARBAGE, (WHICH I DO NOT BELIEVE, i think they are on a gold mine) But even if it was total garbage, the short squeeze would still make alot of pople rich, no matter the state of the company. But for some reason you try to infer that bad fundamentals could affect the short squeee which is totally untrue, either there is or there isn't, we will all know in the future, it is a simple law of supply and demand. Instead, the company should have been forthcoming with ALL information, and challenging shareholders to sell "themselves" on the merits of this company's business plan and potential. Shareholder Why? It makes no difference in a short squeeze. confidence can only be based upon acknowledgement of mistakes made in the past and managment's plan to correct them in the future. Even if they make colossal blunders with that 10 million, it still does not change the universal rules of supply and demand, why do you think it does? I am very concerned that through this "selling" of the short squeeze concept and basing expected price increases solely on this scenario that "newbies" may be inclined to ignore any derogatory fundamental information. That is why the "Nays" must be out here bringing up the Fundamental information has no bearing in a short squeeze9even if it is derogatory), we all know what the issues are and only time will tell, not your naysying that we better have good fundamentals for the laws of supply and demand to work. potential "red flags" and the risks and ramifications of what the Yeas are saying. Anyone who invests on simply what YOU say or I say, should not be here investing anyways. I personally feel water (the LIFE GIVER) will have a very succesful future and we are on a veritable gold mine. but this is like a game and investors must accept the fact that evey game has winners or losers and the only risk takers should play. The Yeas have a vested interest in maintaining this short squeeze regardless of any derogatory information that may appear. They are Again, your inferences that a short squeeze requires fundamental data only shows your lack of education in the basic laws of supply and demand. not interested in demanding management to address the inconsistencies in their press releases if it may lead to less than encouraging responses from company officers. The Nays are here (at I will be honest with you, if there is not a short squeeze (which I believe) and if they were not on a huge gold mine in a growing industry (which I also believe) the simple fact they will have 10 million makes it a great play at current prices, but then you do not believe in simple economics. least I am) to remind them that shareholders must demand accountability from management when derogatory information is presented, correct or false. Still no matter how deragatory, it makes no difference in a squeeze no matter how many times you try to say it does!