Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RJA_ who wrote (92990)	7/28/2012 1:35:35 AM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Respond to of 217686

<<"So, no, I don't think it's a muddle by outcome, but a systemic crash... hopefully big enough to cause a rethink about the entire current setup with funny money and central economic planning. "But that would take a very big crash.">> yeup, counting on it, because concatenating rule-by-making-up-rules universal suffrage coke-n-pepsi lowest common denominator selection of corporate media-friendly career politician by less than qualified always-majority on the one hand w/ entitlement built on the sweat, savings, and diligence of others on the other, and all wrapped in a global reserve currency regime cannot but guarantee a very big, and imo, defining crash. but, no hurry, still 6-14 (much closer to 14, imo) good years of aggregation left. the 6 years time mark assumes china / japan / usa / europe / uk / swiss are very smart - and they are not. uk / swiss in above group only because together they would be the canaries in the fiat money coal mine, and should the euro break up, we simply add in italian, french, and german central banks we shall learn much going forward into still more interesting times, and best if we also make the times profitable, a difficult thing in a zirp / nirp universe unless we are willing to answer the call of gold imperative, that being either beat gold or be one w/ gold amen