SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sun Tzu who wrote (20907)7/28/2012 10:04:16 AM
From: Sdgla3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Change for the single purpose of radical change achieves nothing. I think LB's mentor puts it perfectly :

Conservatism is concerned with codifying past controls of property, the improvement of property, the protection of property, and the moral utilization of property.
Start with with that as the root concept and grow from there.



To: Sun Tzu who wrote (20907)7/28/2012 10:28:42 AM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Off the top of my head, I favor vouchers for school choice. That's a new concept, but one which is worth giving a try.

Though I'm not sure how to get there, I like the idea of adjusting health insurance in the direction of coverage for large bills only. Right now, if people get the flu, their insurance covers their visit to a doctor. People really need insurance for things like cancer that is going to cost them a lot. If auto insurance covered things like oil changes, imagine how expensive it would be. That's a change from anything we've had in the past half century plus.

I favor open carry laws for firearms, something we haven't had for over a century in most places.

OK, there's three changes that would be radically different from the past. If I thought about it, I could come up with more. Those were off the top of my head. And they're all changes designed to maximize people's choices and liberty.