Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joseph B. Schmidt who wrote (27080)	8/1/2012 1:30:22 PM
From: 1Coffeehound	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

I believe you when you say you were not compensated in any way from JBII or a third party. It's his circuitous way of getting to an answer that makes everything he says now look suspect. For instance, JBII is a stock symbol not a company. This leaves open for interpretation that he was possibly compensated by JBI, the company, or John Bordynuik, the man. He still hasn't answered the question of whether he was compensated in cash or securities to promote the company. It was a simple question that required only a "yes" or "no" answer.

To: Joseph B. Schmidt who wrote (27080)	8/1/2012 7:02:11 PM
From: jimmenknee	Respond to of 53574

I don't think he can prove it. His other post regarding $10/bbl works backwards (ref: Message 28160883 ) At the time JB made the claim (2009), the business model was 2 processors per site and JB suggested they were getting paid to take the feed stock (ref: siliconinvestor.com ) 2 employees @ $20/hr and the catalyst cost w/ production time above 80% eat up almost all the $10/bbl Now shred? Add the overhead? Can't make it happen unless he readjusts to 3 processors and a higher feed/production rate-- and that breaks the original (baseline) assertion.